Having trouble with Integration by Parts

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the integration of the function arctan(√x) using integration by parts. The initial approach involves setting u = arctan(√x) and dv = dx, leading to a complex integral that seems to circle back to the original function. A second case simplifies the integrand, allowing for a clearer path to the solution, ultimately revealing that the integral can be expressed in terms of arctan(√x) and other simpler integrals. The final steps confirm that the integration yields a result involving arctan(√x) and a constant, demonstrating the importance of recognizing patterns in integration. The participants emphasize the value of breaking down complex expressions to find solutions.
relinquished™
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I'm real stuck with this problem of mine in The Calculus 7 by Leithold

<br /> \int arctan \sqrt{x} dx<br />

Since there is no elementary formula for integration of an inverse trigo function, we cannot manipulate the integrand in such a way as to integrate easily with one step of Integration by parts.(please verify)

So first, If we let u = arctan \sqrt{x} and
dv = dx

then

du = \frac{dx}{2 \sqrt{x} (x+1)} and
v=x

then we have

<br /> \int arctan \sqrt{x} dx = xarctan \sqrt{x} - \int \frac{xdx}{2 \sqrt{x} (x+1)}<br />

Now, Case 1, without simplifying \frac{x}{\sqrt {x}}

let db = \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x} (x+1)}dx
and a = x.
Then da = dx
and b = arctan \sqrt{x}

so

<br /> \int arctan \sqrt{x} dx = xarctan \sqrt{x} - xarctan \sqrt{x} + \int arctan \sqrt{x} dx

which of course will lead us nowhere but 0=0

Now, Case 2 - If we simplify \frac{x}{\sqrt {x}} = \sqrt{x}

let a= \sqrt{x} and db = \frac{dx}{1+x},
then da = \frac{dx}{2 \sqrt{x}} and b = ln (x+1)

so

<br /> \int arctan \sqrt{x} dx = xarctan \sqrt{x} - \frac{1}{2} ( \sqrt{x}ln (x+1) - \int \frac{ln |1+x| dx}{2 \sqrt{x}})

and if we do Integration by parts again, we will just get an infinite sequence of \sqrt{x}ln (x+1) (please verify)

I'm really open to suggestions ^_^`
 
Physics news on Phys.org
javascript:;
 
\int arctan \sqrt{x} dx = xarctan \sqrt{x} - \int \frac{xdx}{2 \sqrt{x} (x+1)}

From there... add 1 and -1 to your numerator, and disect the expression into two... hope you figure out the next steps. (in your integral of udv)
 
0.0 hey... why didn't I think of that?

\int arctan \sqrt{x} dx = xarctan \sqrt{x} - \int \frac{xdx}{2 \sqrt{x} (x+1)}

\int arctan \sqrt{x} dx = xarctan \sqrt{x} - \int \frac{x + 1 - 1}{2 \sqrt{x} (x+1)}dx

\int arctan \sqrt{x} dx = xarctan \sqrt{x} - \int ( \frac{(x + 1)}{2 \sqrt{x} (x+1)} - \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x} (x+1)}) dx

\int arctan \sqrt{x} dx = xarctan \sqrt{x} - \int ( \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x}} - \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x} (x+1)}) dx

\int arctan \sqrt{x} dx = xarctan \sqrt{x} - \int \frac{dx}{2 \sqrt{x}} + \int \frac{dx}{2 \sqrt{x} (x+1)}

\int arctan \sqrt{x} dx = xarctan \sqrt{x} - \sqrt{x} + \int \frac{dx}{2 \sqrt{x} (x+1)})

let u^2 = x, then u = \sqrt{x}, since du = \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x}}it can be integrated directly and it yields arctan...

so

\int arctan \sqrt{x} dx = xarctan \sqrt{x} - \sqrt{x} + \int \frac{du}{(u^2+1)}

\int arctan \sqrt{x} dx = xarctan \sqrt{x} - \sqrt{x} + arctan \sqrt{x} + C

Is this correct? ^_^;;

Man... I really don't like it when the answer is just right in your face and slaps you XD. Gotta remember the +a -a concept ^_^;;; Thanx btw Irony of Truth
 
now that's correct.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top