Medical Health affects due to aboveground nuclear bomb explosions

AI Thread Summary
Between 1945 and the US ban on aboveground nuclear explosions, approximately 300 nuclear devices were detonated, leading to significant nuclear fallout. There is a concern about the lack of comprehensive studies tracking the health impacts of this fallout, particularly regarding cancer and other diseases. Some believe that during the 1950s, the US government limited research to avoid self-incrimination, focusing only on predicted fallout zones rather than broader population effects. The discussion raises questions about whether dedicated medical scientists have systematically tracked the health consequences for the general population, including mortality and behavioral changes. Additionally, there is interest in whether global studies have been conducted, noting that countries like Russia, France, and the UK also conducted nuclear tests. Health physicists have been researching these effects, with numerous articles available in their journals, though there is uncertainty about whether these studies are based on original research or secondary data.
DrClapeyron
From 1945 until the US put a ban on aboveground nuclear explosions in the US, there were some 300 nuclear devices exploded aboveground in the US. These explosions lead to an eventual nuclear fallout. Anyone have resources like books or internet sites that detail the medical research and overall research of tracking this fallout and any subsequent rise in diseases such as cancer?

I have been told that such a study does not exist because at the time, in the 1950's, the US government did not want to incriminate itself. So consideration for nuclear fallout was restricted to where scientists and engineers believed the eventual fall out would land. So have any dedicated medical scientists (MD's, stats, engineers) tried to keep track of what this event did to the greater population, like how many people died, got sick or changes in mood and other behaviour?

For bonus points, has there at all been world wide study? I think Russia, France and UK did as much damage as the US.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Do you mean a comprehensive study ov the overall effects, or small localized studies? health physicists have been studying these effects for quite some time now, and you can find numerous articles in their journals. Take a look http://hps.org/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sounds like an interesting site, I will have to investifate further. However, when you say for quite some time is that indication that these studies are based on original research or based on data from others' research?
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top