How to Estimate the Constant Eps for Real Materials from Experimental C(T)?

AI Thread Summary
To estimate the constant eps for real materials from experimental C(T), one can plot C/Nk against kT/eps, where C is the heat capacity, k is the Boltzmann constant, and N is the number of particles. The relationship can be expressed as C/Nk = a(kT/eps), with 'a' being a proportionality constant. By identifying a point on the graph where the slope is steep, a rough value for 'a' can be determined, minimizing error. The same method applies to experimental values, treating eps as the unknown. This approach simplifies the estimation process for eps using numerical data.
YAHA
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am working on a problem for my Thermal Physics course. In short, its a numerical problem. I had to go through some Excel calculations and end up with two columns of numbers. One, C/Nk, where C-heat capacity, k-boltzmann constant, N-number of particles and the other is kT/eps, where k-Boltzmann constant, T-temperature, eps-some unit of energy. I have sets of numbers in both of these columns, so I can plot C/Nk as a function of kT/eps.

Then, I am am given an experimentally measured C(T) for some real materials and asked to estimate(roughly) the constant eps for each of the materials. How do I go about this? Any hints? I have tried doing some numerical methods, but end up with a mess. There has to be some quick and simple way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming that only C depends on T, you can write
<br /> \frac{C}{Nk} = a \frac{k T}{\epsilon},<br />
where a is some proportionality constant. On your graph of C/Nk vs k T/\epsilon, find some point where you can find an approximate value for a (hint: the steeper the slope, the smaller the error).

Then, do the same for the experimental values, with \epsilon the unknown, instead of a.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top