Heat dissipated by a cylinder in a magnetic field

Mr.Joule
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We have a cylinder (radius r, height h, conductivity γ) and it is immersed in a variable magnetic field B(t) = B0* e^(-t/T). The field is parallel to the axis of the cylinder.

The problem then asks to find the heat dissipated by the cylinder after an infinitely long time.

Homework Equations



W = \int R i^2 dt

i = (-1/R) * \pi r^2 dB/dt

The Attempt at a Solution




I consider the cylinder as a succession of circular loops.

Let's consider one loop:

The heat dissipated is: W = \int R i^2 dt

where

R = \rho \frac{l}{S} = \frac{2\pi r}{γ*S}

i^2 = (E/R)^2 = (1/R^2) (\frac{d\varphi(B)}{dt})^2 = (1/R^2) \pi^2 r^4 (dB/dt)^2

where E is the Electromotive force.

So:

(dB/dt)^2 = (B0/T)^2 * e ^ {-2t/T}

W = \int R i^2 dt = R/R^2 \pi^2 r^4 (B0/T)^2 \int_0^\infty e^{-2t/T} dt =(\pi^2 r^4 (B0/T)^2)*T/2R

Since there are h loops, the result is \frac{h*\pi^2 *r^4 (B_0)^2}{2RT}

Is this right?

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're on the right track, but realize that h → ∞ !
And so of course the current di in each loop must be infitesmally small, also that the resistance of a loop will vary with r, 0 < r < radius. (I am making r variable. Dumb to use r for radius, but can't use R either since R is resistance).

In other words, consider an annulus of differential width dr and get the corresponding resistance R(r), then di = emf(r)/R(r), then integrate dP = (di^2)*R from 0 to r, then integrate dP over time t from 0 to ∞ (energy = ∫power*dt).

Good problem!
 
Hey :) Thanks a lot for your help.

Let's give it a second try step by step.

1. why does h → ∞ ? it isn't an infinitely long cylinder!

2. The cross section of the wire is A (constant), so

dR(r) = rho * dL/A = (rho * 2pi * dr)/A, right?

Now, di = emf(r)/R(r) with

d emf(r) = 2pi*rdr dB/dt

but now di = (dB/dt)*A*r since dr disappeared. I think it can't be right. :\
 
Mr.Joule said:
Hey :) Thanks a lot for your help.

Let's give it a second try step by step.

1. why does h → ∞ ? it isn't an infinitely long cylinder!

Mea culpa. I got confused when you spoke of "h loops".

OK, think of an elemental annulus, height = h, thickness = dr, radius = r. The annuli comprising the cylinder range in radius fro 0 to R. (I will call italicized R the radius of your wire/cylinder.) In other words, think of the cylinder as kind of a cylindrical onion, with the annuli represented by the onion's layers.

There will be an emf generated around this elemental annulus. The conductance of this annulus will be dS = γ*h*dr/2πr Siemens. You need to visualize the annulus as being unfolded to a slab of metal with dimensions length = 2πr width = h, thickness = dr.

The emf around this annulus' contour will be area * dB/dt (ignoring sign). Area = πr2.

The current di will then be emf*dS, and the power dissipation will be dP = (emf)2*dS.

To get the total power you now need to integrate dP from r = 0 to r = R.

Finally you need to integrate P from t = 0 to t = ∞ to get the total energy, which of course is the heat you're looking for.





2. The cross section of the wire is A (constant), so

dR(r) = rho * dL/A = (rho * 2pi * dr)/A, right?

Now, di = emf(r)/R(r) with

d emf(r) = 2pi*rdr dB/dt

but now di = (dB/dt)*A*r since dr disappeared. I think it can't be right. :\[/QUOTE]

The current does not flow along the wire. The current flows in circles inside the wire. Other than that I don't follow your math. Where did 2pi*dr come from?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top