Heat flux trough non-homogeneous bar

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether a non-homogeneous bar with differing thermal conductivities (k1 and k2) can be treated as a homogeneous bar using a weighted mean of the conductivities. The key consideration is whether the thermal conductivities are arranged in series or parallel, as this affects the heat flux calculations. Understanding the configuration is crucial for accurately modeling the heat transfer. The consensus suggests that while a simplified approach can be used, the specific arrangement significantly influences the results. Thus, the thermal behavior of the bar cannot be generalized without clarifying its configuration.
AbreuEE
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
When you have the both sides of a non-homogeneous bar with thermal conductivities k1 and k2 in contact to 2 different temperatures, can you consider it the same as if there was some flux going through a homogeneous bar with the weighted mean of k1 and k2 as the conductivity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AbreuEE said:
When you have the both sides of a non-homogeneous bar with thermal conductivities k1 and k2 in contact to 2 different temperatures, can you consider it the same as if there was some flux going through a homogeneous bar with the weighted mean of k1 and k2 as the conductivity?
Yes, but you haven't told us whether they are in series or on parallel.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top