Heat: Microscope - Seeing Matter React

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around observing how matter reacts to heat, particularly through the lens of Brownian motion, which illustrates the random movement of particles. Participants explore the methods to measure the speed of these particles, questioning whether it can be determined by the average size and frequency of their movements. The conversation references the Kinetic Theory of Gases, suggesting that detailed predictions and measurements, such as the time of flight of gas molecules, provide evidence for the relationship between temperature and particle motion. It is noted that while absolute zero (0 K) would theoretically halt motion, practical observations correlate increased temperature with increased particle movement.
CollinsArg
Messages
51
Reaction score
2
Hi! is there any microscope or images in which we can see how a matter reacts as it is heated?

And how was it proved that when matter is heated their particules vibrate faster?. Tahnk you!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Well, it seems to me you could get a pretty good idea from observing Brownian motion.

So you need a microscope and pollen grains.
 
  • Like
Likes CollinsArg
I understand that Brownian motion is supposed to demonstrate that molecules are in random movement, but how would one judge their mean speed? By the average size of the movements, the frequency of movements of a certain size, or what? Would any difference be large enough to notice?
But I suppose ultimately you must be right, as at 0 K presumably one could see it stop.

Maybe the evidence he seeks is something like this Kinetic Theory of Gases (page 1/24 ) measuring the time of flight of gas molecules.
But for me the "proof" is in all the detailed predictions which have been calculated using the kinetic theory.
 
Merlin3189 said:
...how would one judge their mean speed? By the average size of the movements, the frequency of movements of a certain size, or what? Would any difference be large enough to notice?
I think the page I linked to goes into detail about random walks. They could be quantified to produce a formula.

Merlin3189 said:
But I suppose ultimately you must be right, as at 0 K presumably one could see it stop.
Well, technically, that can't happen but yes, there would be a correlation between motion and temp.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top