Heat transfer coeffcient expression

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving an expression for the convective heat transfer coefficient in the context of thermal boundary layers over an isothermal plate. It highlights that at the plate's surface, heat transfer occurs primarily through conduction due to the zero fluid velocity, while convection becomes significant as the boundary layer develops. Participants express confusion about combining conduction and convection equations to derive the heat transfer coefficient, emphasizing that both mechanisms contribute to heat transfer, especially in laminar flow scenarios. The conversation clarifies that while conduction dominates near the surface, bulk fluid motion also plays a critical role in enhancing heat transfer. Overall, the interplay between conduction and convection in boundary layer dynamics is essential for understanding heat transfer coefficients.
Sahil Dev
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Getting an expression for the convective heat tarnsfer coefficient.

Homework Equations


See attached images

The Attempt at a Solution


I have been reading about the boundary layers.

Here is an extract of my notes corresponding to thermal boundary layer and consequently my question.

Consider flow over an isothermal plate as shown in the figure.

flow_over_isothermal_plate.png


As seen in the figure above, at the leading edge, the temperature profile is uniform with T(y) = T∞. However, the fluid particles that come into contact with the plate, achieve thermal equilibrium at the plate’s surface temperature.
In turn, these particles exchange energy with those in the adjoining fluid layer and temperature gradients develop in the fluid. The region of the fluid in which these temperature gradients exist is the thermal boundary layer.
The thickness δst of the thermal boundary layer is typically defined as the value of y for which the ratio:
ratio.png


With increased distance from the leading edge, the effects heat transfer penetrates further into the free stream and the thermal boundary layer grows.
The relationship between the conditions in the boundary layer and the convection heat transfer coefficient may readily be demonstrated.
At any distance, ‘x’ from the leading edge, the local surface heat flux may be obtained by applying Fourier’s law to the fluid at y =0. That is;
qs_dd_1.png


This expression is appropriate because at the surface, there is no fluid motion and heat transfer occurs by conduction.
Recalling, the Newton’s law of cooling, we see that;
qs_dd_2.png


And combining this with the expression of conduction transfer as just above;

h.png


QUESTION:

1) I do not follow how the above equations: one corresponding to heat transfer through conduction) and the other corresponding to heat transfer through convection, can eb combned to give the heat transfer coefficient?
2) I do not see the logic in combining conductive and convective heat transfer related equations to give the heat trasnfer coefficient: h.

Please can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sahil Dev said:

Homework Statement



Getting an expression for the convective heat tarnsfer coefficient.

Homework Equations


See attached images

The Attempt at a Solution


I have been reading about the boundary layers.

Here is an extract of my notes corresponding to thermal boundary layer and consequently my question.

Consider flow over an isothermal plate as shown in the figure.

View attachment 84992

As seen in the figure above, at the leading edge, the temperature profile is uniform with T(y) = T∞. However, the fluid particles that come into contact with the plate, achieve thermal equilibrium at the plate’s surface temperature.
In turn, these particles exchange energy with those in the adjoining fluid layer and temperature gradients develop in the fluid. The region of the fluid in which these temperature gradients exist is the thermal boundary layer.
The thickness δst of the thermal boundary layer is typically defined as the value of y for which the ratio:
View attachment 84993

With increased distance from the leading edge, the effects heat transfer penetrates further into the free stream and the thermal boundary layer grows.
The relationship between the conditions in the boundary layer and the convection heat transfer coefficient may readily be demonstrated.
At any distance, ‘x’ from the leading edge, the local surface heat flux may be obtained by applying Fourier’s law to the fluid at y =0. That is;
View attachment 84994

This expression is appropriate because at the surface, there is no fluid motion and heat transfer occurs by conduction.
Recalling, the Newton’s law of cooling, we see that;
View attachment 84995

And combining this with the expression of conduction transfer as just above;

View attachment 84996

QUESTION:

1) I do not follow how the above equations: one corresponding to heat transfer through conduction) and the other corresponding to heat transfer through convection, can eb combned to give the heat transfer coefficient?
2) I do not see the logic in combining conductive and convective heat transfer related equations to give the heat trasnfer coefficient: h.

Please can anyone help?
The sentence that seems to be causing some of your confusion is the following:

"This expression is appropriate because at the surface, there is no fluid motion and heat transfer occurs by conduction."

The reality of the situation is that, irrespective of whether the fluid is in motion and shearing, the heat flux at a distance y from the wall is always occurring exclusively by conduction, and the flux is given by:

$$q(y)=-k_f\frac{\partial T}{\partial y}$$

But, if you want the heat flux at the wall, you need to evaluate the partial derivative at y = 0.

Chet
 
Sorry for the late reply. I was concentarting on another subject during the past fw weeks.

1) How can you say :

The reality of the situation is that, irrespective whether the fluid is in motion and shearingm the ehat flux at a distance y from the wall is always occurring exclusively by conduction ?

The convection heat transfer mode is sustained both by random molecular motion and by the bulk motion of the fluid within the boundary layer. The contribution due to random molecular motion (diffusion / conduction) dominates near the surface where the fluid velocity is low. In fact, at the interface between the surface and the fluid the fluid velocity is zero, and heat is transferred by this (conduction) mechanism only.

The contribution due to bulk fluid motion originates rom the fact that the boundary layer grows as the flow progresses in the x- direction.

So, there is a heat transfer due to bulk fluid motion (advection) and conduction. I do not agrree wit you when yoiu say that the transfer is through pure conduction.

2) On further reading, I found that the convection heat transfer appears as a boundary condition in solution od conduction problems.


Consiuder the following problem;

example_2_4.gif
example_2_4.gif


We can solve the above as below;

example_2_4_soln.gif
example_2_4_soln.gif


We solve (1) aby appplying boundary conditions 2,3, 4

Theerfore convective heat tarnsfer is applied as a boundary condition in conduction problems.
 
In the example you cited, it is inherently assumed that the heat transfer coefficient is constant, the boundary layer thickness is constant, and the flow is turbulent. This certainly qualifies as convectively enhanced heat transfer. In the free stream turbulent flow, tiny hotter and colder parcels of fluid are intermittently brought in and out of contact with one another, which results in very rapid conductive thermal equilibration of the parcels. So, even here, conduction is a major part of what is happening.

In the example you cited in post #1, the flow regime appears to be laminar flow heat transfer over a flat plate. If the plate is hotter than the fluid, then as the fluid flows over the plate, colder outer layers of fluid are flowing faster than slower inner layers of fluid. This convective shear increases the vertical temperature gradients within the fluid in the y direction at all locations. This results in enhanced conductive heat flux in the y direction at all locations, both close to the wall and away from the wall. However, since the velocity gradients are greater near the wall, the enhancement in this region is more effective. In any event, vertical conduction is occurring in the y direction at all y locations, but this is enhancement is associated with sharpening of the temperature gradients as a result of the shear flow.

Hope this helps.

Chet
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top