Heaviside's Method for Regular Singular Points

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ted123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Regular
Ted123
Messages
428
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/9868/heaviside.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You should have y''+ py'+ qy= 0 and (x- x_0)^2q(x) finite. You have left out the "q"s. Also, you say that x_0 is a regular singular point if those are finite. In order that x_0 be a singular point, at least one of the two limits of p and q, as x goes to x_0 must not exist.

Yes, from what you have, x= 0 is a regular singular point for a and c, it not a regular singular point for d. But I would say that x= 0 is not even a singular point for b.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You should have y''+ py'+ qy= 0 and (x- x_0)^2q(x) finite. You have left out the "q"s. Also, you say that x_0 is a regular singular point if those are finite. In order that x_0 be a singular point, at least one of the two limits of p and q, as x goes to x_0 must not exist.

Yes, from what you have, x= 0 is a regular singular point for a and c, it not a regular singular point for d. But I would say that x= 0 is not even a singular point for b.

Yes, I accidently missed the q's. And thanks for the explanation. I think the definition should read 'A singular point x_0 is called regular if both those are finite as x-> x_0.'
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top