Height Question: Projectile launched from a table

AI Thread Summary
A toy car rolls off a table at an initial velocity of 2.81 m/sec and lands 1.55 m away horizontally. The calculation for the time of flight is correct at approximately 0.55 seconds. The user initially misapplied the sign for gravitational acceleration in their vertical motion equation, leading to a negative height result. By consistently defining the direction of positive displacement, the user can correctly apply the formula and achieve a positive height for the table. Clarifying the sign convention for displacement and acceleration is crucial for solving projectile motion problems accurately.
fandomgeek_394
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A toy car rolls off of a table at an initial angle of 0 degrees and an initial velocity of 2.81 m/sec. The ball hits the floor 1.55 m (horizontally) from the edge of this table. How tall is the table?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So far I have:
Vo=(2.81 m/sec) * cos(0 degrees)=2.81 m/sec
Delta x= vot + one half at^2
1.55m=(2.81 m/sec) times t plus one half times (0) times t^2
t=1.55 m/2.81 m/sec=0.55 sec
Vo=(2.81 m/sec) times sin(0 degrees)=0 m/sec
Delta x=vot plus one half at ^2
Delta x= (0 m/sec) times (0.55) plus one half times (-9.8 m/sec) times (0.55 sec)^2=

The result I ended up getting was -1.48225 when I was done; I feel I know I must have made a mistake at some point, as the answer shouldn't have turned up negative. Someone I asked briefly on another site came up with the answer 1.488m for the problem; I'm just not quite sure what I got off. Could someone help me figure this one out please? I feel I'm close, but off somewhat. Thanks for the help & the patience, guys.
Really do want to learn, and whatever help you can give me in making sure I get this problem right would be very appreciated. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula you used for the vertical motion gives you the displacement at time t. You took up as positive, making g negative. In falling to the floor, would you expect the displacement to be positive or negative?
 
Negative? I feel kind of ridiculous right now, but I still don't quite understand... Do you think you could tell me what lines in my data are off and what exactly in them I need to change? I think that would help me.
 
Was it the -9.8 in the problem that I got wrong? I just noticed that when I make that positive instead of negative, I get the positive answer.
 
fandomgeek_394 said:
Was it the -9.8 in the problem that I got wrong? I just noticed that when I make that positive instead of negative, I get the positive answer.
You have to decide whether to make up positive or down positive. It does not matter so long as you are consistent. If up is positive then both the gravitational acceleration and the displacement are negative.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top