Hello everyone, having troulbes applying Kirchoff's Rule~DC circuits

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Kirchhoff's Rule to a DC circuit problem involving two batteries and three resistors. The user initially sets up three equations based on the circuit but struggles to substitute the current values correctly. A suggestion is made to substitute I_2 in terms of I_1 and I_3 to simplify the equations. The user acknowledges a mistake in their second equation, which is pointed out by another participant, indicating a sign error in the current terms. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful equation setup and substitution in solving circuit problems.
mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone, this is my first problem dealing with Kirchoffs Rule and I thought I did it right...here is the circuit...
http://www.webassign.net/hrw/hrw7_27-40.gif
the info is the following:
In Figure 27-40, the resistances are R1 = 1 , R2 = 2.2 , and the ideal batteries have emfs E1 = 2.0 V, and E2 = 3 = 3 V.


Fig. 27-40

(a) What is the current through each battery? (Take upward to be positive.)
battery 1 A
battery 2 A
battery 3 A

(b) What is the potential difference Va - Vb?
V

I came out with the following 3 equations:
E1 + (-R1)(I_1) + R2*I_2 - E2 -R1*I_1;
-R2*I_2 + R1*I_3 - E3 + R1*I_3 + E2;
I_1 + I_2 + I_3 = 0;

When i solve for I_1 = -I_2 -I_3
Where do I plug I_1 into? i tried the first equation and i couldn't solve for any I, and i can't for the 2nd, because there is no I_1, did i do this right? thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Substitute for I_2 = -I_1 - I_3 into both the first two eqns, since it is common to both.
Then you will have two eqns in two unknowns.
 
Thanks! that worked out great, but I messed somewhere writing out the 2nd circuit on the right...This is the equation i got and the work:
http://img477.imageshack.us/img477/956/lastscan6lq.jpg
its wrong...
The first one, i did, on the left, was right though. Any help would be great.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
On your last line - in the attachment - the -R1.I2 should be +R1.I3.

It looks like this mistake was copied through from the line before it.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top