Hello, how can I replace a variable capacitor with a varicap

In summary: R1 and... the pot is 470K, can you tell me why?In summary, the circuit should work, but there are some obvious problems that need to be fixed.
  • #1
michael1978
434
19
hello, can somebody help me? i found this am receiver, but is using variable capacitor, how can i replace of do with varicap this circuits(i hava varicap bb112)
receiver.png
 

Attachments

  • receiver.png
    receiver.png
    4.6 KB · Views: 2,796
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
You will have a hard time finding a 500 pF varicap diode. I did a quick search on digikey and found: https://www.digikey.com/products/en?keywords=varactor
 
  • #3
Averagesupernova said:
You will have a hard time finding a 500 pF varicap diode. I did a quick search on digikey and found: https://www.digikey.com/products/en?keywords=varactor
this varicap is 520pF
 
  • #4
The varicap is voltage driven, so you must isolate it with a 1nF capacitor at each end. Or - bring one end of the varicap to ground like this:
vco.gif
 

Attachments

  • vco.gif
    vco.gif
    2.4 KB · Views: 2,793
  • #5
Svein said:
The varicap is voltage driven, so you must isolate it with a 1nF capacitor at each end. Or - bring one end of the varicap to ground like this:
View attachment 221826
Svein said:
The varicap is voltage driven, so you must isolate it with a 1nF capacitor at each end. Or - bring one end of the varicap to ground like this:
View attachment 221826
I search a lot in internet and i so your circuits, and i did not find help so i come here to help me, because i have no variable capacitor
So to remove variable cabacitor, and to add R1 C1 VARICAP, but what about the antenna, how to make antenna, how to where to conected in the circuit?
 
  • #6
michael1978 said:
this varicap is 520pF
Which varicap? The link I posted offers a number of them and nothing comes close to 500 pF.
 
  • #7
Datasheet
min = 440 pF, typ = 470 pF, max = 520 pF

I can't vouch for the datasheet as I've never had a BB112, but Siemens should know.

Edit: PS and BTW, I'm testing some diodes - varicaps, LEDs and simple power diodes - at the moment, and the record is over 1 nF for a Lucas DD710 low voltage power diode
 
  • #8
As for the antenna, use the same connection as in the original diagram. It is shown as inductively coupled to the tuning coil by the 4-5 t winding.
 
  • #9
michael1978 said:
i found this am receiver, but is using variable capacitor, how can i replace of do with varicap this circuits(i hava varicap bb112)
A minor difficulty with that circuit is the floating voltage of the tuned circuit secondary.
If it is to use a varicap, controlled by a DC voltage, it will need to be referenced to ground.

But there is an envelope detector embedded in that circuit, which must not be broken by the change in front end bias.
That might explain why the input RF transformer has a floating tuned secondary.

The supply voltage is 9V, the varicap will need most of that. The control voltage pot needs a regulated voltage.
Without regulation, any change in battery voltage due to audio output load will de-tune the RF circuit.

The pot and regulator will use more current. So power consumption will rise with the change to a varicap.
 
  • Like
Likes Averagesupernova
  • #10
Averagesupernova said:
Which varicap? The link I posted offers a number of them and nothing comes close to 500 pF.
No this was orginal circuits so i replace varicap bb112, but i hear only noise
receiver1.png
 

Attachments

  • receiver1.png
    receiver1.png
    13 KB · Views: 1,882
  • #11
Merlin3189 said:
Datasheet
min = 440 pF, typ = 470 pF, max = 520 pF

I can't vouch for the datasheet as I've never had a BB112, but Siemens should know.

Edit: PS and BTW, I'm testing some diodes - varicaps, LEDs and simple power diodes - at the moment, and the record is over 1 nF for a Lucas DD710 low voltage power diode
yes me too, but i connect without antenna i hear noise
 
  • #12
michael1978 said:
No this was orginal circuits so i replace varicap bb112, but i hear only noise
@michael1978. That looks like LTspice. Have you been successful running that simulation ?
There are some obvious problems, it is easier to edit your file than create another.
Can you please attach your file.asc to a post with the txt extension as file.asc.txt
Attach the plot file in the same way if the simulation worked. file.plt.txt
 
  • #13
Baluncore said:
@michael1978. That looks like LTspice. Have you been successful running that simulation ?
There are some obvious problems, it is easier to edit your file than create another.
Can you please attach your file.asc to a post with the txt extension as file.asc.txt
Attach the plot file in the same way if the simulation worked. file.plt.txt
yes i send you, if you can help me... I RENAME am.asc into am.txt
 

Attachments

  • AM.TXT
    4 KB · Views: 597
  • #14
Here is a modified bias circuit, no model for BB112 or Pot, but circuit should work.
New_1.png

C1 and C2 must be low leakage caps. Avoid power supply bypass caps.
 

Attachments

  • New_1.asc.txt
    4 KB · Views: 566
  • New_1.png
    New_1.png
    24.7 KB · Views: 1,957
  • #15
Baluncore said:
Here is a modified bias circuit, no model for BB112 or Pot, but circuit should work.
View attachment 221877
C1 and C2 must be low leakage caps. Avoid power supply bypass caps.
Baluncore said:
Here is a modified bias circuit, no model for BB112 or Pot, but circuit should work.
View attachment 221877
C1 and C2 must be low leakage caps. Avoid power supply bypass caps.
thank you very much, but i have just 2 more question, why you pick 47K to potentiometer, normally they say a few megaohms, and last where to connect antenna and i need simple inductor 200u ? and that was only for test trnsformer thanks
 
Last edited:
  • #16
michael1978 said:
but i have just 2 more question, why you pick 47K to potentiometer, normally they say a few megaohms, and last where to connect antenna and i need simple inductor 200u ?
1. The resistor needs to be big to keep the Q of the LC circuit high. Any coupling capacitor or varicap reverse leakage current will flow through the resistor, so I use 47k as a starting value. Any resistor over 100k is likely to leak due to environmental contamination.
2. For MW reception I would wind 75 turns on a ferrite rod and use that for the tuning inductor and the antenna. No external antenna is needed.
You could experiment with 50 turns of wire on a 2" or 50mm plastic pipe or cardboard roll. Wind a temporary primary of 12 turns over the coil to couple an external antenna.
 
  • #17
Baluncore said:
1. The resistor needs to be big to keep the Q of the LC circuit high. Any coupling capacitor or varicap reverse leakage current will flow through the resistor, so I use 47k as a starting value. Any resistor over 100k is likely to leak due to environmental contamination.
2. For MW reception I would wind 75 turns on a ferrite rod and use that for the tuning inductor and the antenna. No external antenna is needed.
You could experiment with 50 turns of wire on a 2" or 50mm plastic pipe or cardboard roll. Wind a temporary primary of 12 turns over the coil to couple an external antenna.
hello
but can i use inductor in form of resistor? in place of ferrit rod they are the same of not?
 
  • #18
michael1978 said:
hello
but can i use inductor in form of resistor? in place of ferrit rod they are the same of not?
sorry i make you tired, can you answer me please... thnx
 
Last edited:
  • #19
michael1978 said:
hello
but can i use inductor in form of resistor? in place of ferrit rod they are the same of not?
an inductor ISNT a resistor

follow @Baluncore 's instructions, he is wise in such things :smile:
 
  • #20
davenn said:
an inductor ISNT a resistor
He might be asking if he can use a high-resistance wire-wound resistor as an inductor, but I'm not able to decode his questions very well.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #22
The 200uH inductor is the secondary of an RF transformer. It should have low loss and low wire resistance. It is normal to use an air cored coil wound on a cardboard tube, or a smaller coil wound on a ferrite rod.

The primary of the air cored RF transformer is maybe 6 turns of wire wound over the secondary and used to lightly couple the antenna current into the tuned secondary.

The alternative is a ferrite rod that acts as an antenna wound with wire to make the tuning inductor. That may eliminate the need for the antenna and primary winding. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrite_core#Ferrite_rod_aerial

You might find a 200uH RF “choke” inductor with low loss characteristics, but I doubt it. If you use a small inductor, wound on a small ferrite slug, you will find it very difficult to couple the antenna signal into the small tuning inductor.

The reactance of 190uH at 530kHz is about 630 ohms. The BB112 varicap has a series resistance of 1.5 ohms so the Q will be about 300 which is OK on the AM broadcast band. Keep your tuning inductor wire resistance below 1.5 ohms to have good Q = selectivity.

There are many calculators, such as here; http://zpostbox.ru/how_to_calculate_inductors.html
Try 85 turns, spread over 40mm along a 40mm diameter former.
Work out the length of wire. Then from wire tables, the resistance. Will 85 turns fit along 40mm? 40 / 85 = 0.47mm diam wire.
 
  • #23
berkeman said:
He might be asking if he can use a high-resistance wire-wound resistor as an inductor, but I'm not able to decode his questions very well.
davenn said:
an inductor ISNT a resistor

follow @Baluncore 's instructions, he is wise in such things :smile:
sorry you misundestand me, i have a inductor(i don't know how they call? they look like resistor, but they are inductor)
 
  • #25
davenn said:
an inductor ISNT a resistor

follow @Baluncore 's instructions, he is wise in such things :smile:
sorry you misundestand me, i have a inductor(i don't know how they call? they look like resistor, but they are inductor)
 
  • #26
Baluncore said:
1. The resistor needs to be big to keep the Q of the LC circuit high. Any coupling capacitor or varicap reverse leakage current will flow through the resistor, so I use 47k as a starting value. Any resistor over 100k is likely to leak due to environmental contamination.
2. For MW reception I would wind 75 turns on a ferrite rod and use that for the tuning inductor and the antenna. No external antenna is needed.
You could experiment with 50 turns of wire on a 2" or 50mm plastic pipe or cardboard roll. Wind a temporary primary of 12 turns over the coil to couple an external antenna.
I have those inductor, thay work of not with this inductor?
$_58.jpg
 

Attachments

  • $_58.jpg
    $_58.jpg
    31.9 KB · Views: 1,056
  • #27
michael1978 said:
I have those inductor, thay work of not with this inductor?
View attachment 221909
OK, got that cleared up :smile:

I will say no, you need to go with what Baluncore was telling you in post #22
 
  • #28
michael1978 said:
I have those inductor, thay work of not with this inductor?
If you use a two terminal axial inductor, how will you connect the antenna?

The antenna connects to the primary of the RF transformer, the secondary is tuned to resonance with a capacitor.
 
  • Like
Likes michael1978
  • #29
I don't know whether these inductors would work in this tuned circuit, but since he has them he could try it out. I would expect to be able to couple to it with an overwinding of a few turns, just as in the original circuit.
 
  • Like
Likes michael1978
  • #30
Merlin3189 said:
I don't know whether these inductors would work in this tuned circuit, but since he has them he could try it out. I would expect to be able to couple to it with an overwinding of a few turns, just as in the original circuit.
thanks merlin
 
  • #31
Baluncore said:
If you use a two terminal axial inductor, how will you connect the antenna?

The antenna connects to the primary of the RF transformer, the secondary is tuned to resonance with a capacitor.
Baluncore said:
If you use a two terminal axial inductor, how will you connect the antenna?

The antenna connects to the primary of the RF transformer, the secondary is tuned to resonance with a capacitor.
sorry i did not know about that, i was think you bay axial inductor and you fixit, so you need a transformer and for every tunned receiver, but for what you use axial inductor?
 
Last edited:
  • #32
michael1978 said:
but for what you use axial inductor?
Axial inductors were used in “through hole” circuit boards, but where still needed are replaced by surface mount components. Axial inductors were used to reduce the size of PCBs in analogue television and video tape recorders.

Physically small inductors are used to control the frequency response of high impedance analogue signal circuits. But analogue is now replaced by digital signal processing. Small inductors are used as “chokes” to block RF or high frequency noise in some signal circuits.
 
  • Like
Likes michael1978
  • #33
Merlin3189 said:
I don't know whether these inductors would work in this tuned circuit, but since he has them he could try it out. I would expect to be able to couple to it with an overwinding of a few turns, just as in the original circuit.
It is hard to keep the magnetic field inside a small inductor that is wound on an open ferrite spool. Well designed axial inductors will have an outer magnetic sleeve or screen to reduce the external stray fields. That will make it more difficult to magnetically couple by over-winding a primary.

It would be good to have a working receiver of conservative design, then to try minor changes in an attempt to improve performance.
It is a truism that, implementing too many new ideas in one prototype will always result in a failure.

Small inductors usually have thin wire, so high resistance. That makes the Q low and so reduces the selectivity if used in a tuned circuit.
Tuned circuit Q will be reduced by the varicap series resistance of a few ohms. That needs to be countered by an inductor with lower series resistance.
 
  • Like
Likes michael1978
  • #34
Baluncore said:
It is hard to keep the magnetic field inside a small inductor that is wound on an open ferrite spool. Well designed axial inductors will have an outer magnetic sleeve or screen to reduce the external stray fields. That will make it more difficult to magnetically couple by over-winding a primary.

It would be good to have a working receiver of conservative design, then to try minor changes in an attempt to improve performance.
It is a truism that, implementing too many new ideas in one prototype will always result in a failure.

Small inductors usually have thin wire, so high resistance. That makes the Q low and so reduces the selectivity if used in a tuned circuit.
Tuned circuit Q will be reduced by the varicap series resistance of a few ohms. That needs to be countered by an inductor with lower series resistance.
thanks for helping me... ;-)
and for circuit you told me to make a coil, coil is winding turns in ferrit of bobbin, like in this video, If you have time to watch is 6min you do need to watch all, here is the link

what doe mean, when they say primary coil 200micro, and what about secondary? they don't say nothing about secondary?[/MEDIA]
 
Last edited:
  • #35
michael1978 said:
what doe mean, when they say primary coil 200micro, and what about secondary? they don't say nothing about secondary?
Maybe something is different, or they do not know what they are doing or what they are saying.

I am at the end of the world. I do not have bandwidth for video. Video is not good for circuit diagrams.

For your RF transformer; The secondary is tuned by the variable capacitor. The secondary should be about 200uH.
You can wind the 6 turn primary on top of the secondary winding later. You can use PVC insulated wire for the primary.
Experiment with the relative position of primary and the number of turns.
 

Similar threads

  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
925
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
889
Back
Top