Courses Help an Undergrad Physics student decide on Electives

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an Applied Physics undergraduate seeking advice on elective course selections for their second and third years. They are deciding between Physical Chemistry and Sensors & Actuators, with implications for their future career path. The consensus among peers suggests that choosing the Chemistry modules may align better with an academic career, while the Sensors route is seen as more industry-oriented. The individual expresses a preference for Chemistry labs despite initial difficulties and finds Electronics labs less engaging. They are encouraged to consider the versatility of Sensors, particularly in fields like robotics and the Internet of Things, which are rapidly growing. Additionally, there's a suggestion to enhance their programming skills, particularly in relation to sensor technology, to broaden their employability. Overall, the Sensors path is viewed as offering more diverse opportunities in both academia and industry.
bocces
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I'm an Applied Physics Undergrad who just finished first year and I ended up with a 2:1, which is grand.

Anyway, in second year we have to pick between two electives, Physical Chemistry 3 or Sensors & Actuators. Then again in third year you have either Physical Chemistry 4 or Instrumentation & Control. (Obviously, if you pick the Chen elective you have to continue on with the Chem stream and vice versa)

Basically, what would be the best to pick? I honestly have no idea what I want to do after my degree. I thought I did but college level physics is different to what I thought it was (in a good way) so I'm sort of back at having no clue as to what I want. I have a feeling those on this forum may work in both industry and others have a more academic life. What would set me up better for a career after college?

Talking to those in other years they said choose the Chem module if you think you want an academic career and then the second module if you want a "straight to industry" career. Again, not sure what I want to do.

Any advice anyone can give would be brilliant.

I was going to base my decision off what I got at the end of first year but I ended up getting the same grade in my Physical Chemistry 1 exam and my Analog Electronics 2 exam (which is a prerequisite for Sensors & Actuators). I preferred the Chemistry labs even though I found them difficult at times. Mostly because I didn't study Chemistry at High School and my first experience of Chemistry was in college. The AE 2 labs to me, were boring and I did find the circuitry at times. However, talking to those in the higher years the labs do become more interesting.

Tl;dr?
Physics Undergrad unsure of what to do with degree, should I choose Chem or Electronics elective.
What's more employable and sets me up for a more "general" Physics education.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Personally I would choose the Sensors route as its could be used in both places. If you want to move to industry you're covered if you want to stay in academia you're covered. Consider how many physics experiments utilize sensors, instrumentation ...

Robotics and the Internet of Things is heating up too and this technology utilizes sensors in a big way.

Why even chemistry uses the sensor and instrumentation technology so to me its a broader path with more options.

I would also suggest some programming that interacts with sensor technology and maybe mechatronics as well.
 
Thanks for the reply.

You pretty much summed up the reasons as to why I would pick the Sensors route.

As regards to programming, I have the basics of Java and I am fairly proficient with MatLab
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top