Help applying summation convention to tensors(generalised Hooke's law)

K29
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
I understand the simplest application of the summation convention.

x_{i}y_{i}

I create a sum of terms such that in each term the subscripts are the same i.e.
x_{1}y_{1}+x_{2}y_{2}+x_{3}y_{3}+...

But now when I look at understanding summation convention applied to the generalised Hooke's law:

\tau _{ik}=C_{ikrs}E_{rs}

I'm a bit unsure what this means. I understand that C is a tensor with 81 components and that by applying the summation convention I should get linear combinations for every \tau component (I think). But as for applying summation convention to see what exactly those sums look like I'm unsure.

The statement below doesn't seem to help my understanding either

"\tau _{ik} is a linear combination of all strain components E_{ik}"

Any assistance would be appreciated.

The Attempt at a Solution



I could hazard I guess and say I only sum when r or s equals i or k, and when r=s and i=k. Still unsure if that is correct though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From your statement about C_ikrs having 81 components, I am assuming that each index ranges over 3 possible values i.e. i = {1,2,3}, and likewise for k, r and s. since only repeated indices are summed over, this means that i and k are not summed over, and you actually have nine different equations represented here, one for each component of tau. So just cycle through all the components of tau (ie all possible values of i and k ):

$$\tau_{11} = C_{1111}E_{11} + C_{1112}E_{12} + C_{1113}E_{13} + C_{1121}E_{21} + C_{1122}E_{22} + C_{1123}E_{23} + C_{1131}E_{31} + C_{1132}E_{32} + C_{1133}E_{33}$$

And that's just ONE of the nine equations. You still have to do the same for tau_12, tau_13, tau_21 et cetera.
 
If it helps, the NON shorthand way of writing your tensor expression would have been: $$ \tau_{ik} = \sum_{r=1}^3\sum_{s=1}^3 C_{ikrs}E_{rs}$$
 
Thank you for the help. Both replies helped me understand.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top