K29
- 103
- 0
I understand the simplest application of the summation convention.
x_{i}y_{i}
I create a sum of terms such that in each term the subscripts are the same i.e.
x_{1}y_{1}+x_{2}y_{2}+x_{3}y_{3}+...
But now when I look at understanding summation convention applied to the generalised Hooke's law:
\tau _{ik}=C_{ikrs}E_{rs}
I'm a bit unsure what this means. I understand that C is a tensor with 81 components and that by applying the summation convention I should get linear combinations for every \tau component (I think). But as for applying summation convention to see what exactly those sums look like I'm unsure.
The statement below doesn't seem to help my understanding either
"\tau _{ik} is a linear combination of all strain components E_{ik}"
Any assistance would be appreciated.
I could hazard I guess and say I only sum when r or s equals i or k, and when r=s and i=k. Still unsure if that is correct though.
x_{i}y_{i}
I create a sum of terms such that in each term the subscripts are the same i.e.
x_{1}y_{1}+x_{2}y_{2}+x_{3}y_{3}+...
But now when I look at understanding summation convention applied to the generalised Hooke's law:
\tau _{ik}=C_{ikrs}E_{rs}
I'm a bit unsure what this means. I understand that C is a tensor with 81 components and that by applying the summation convention I should get linear combinations for every \tau component (I think). But as for applying summation convention to see what exactly those sums look like I'm unsure.
The statement below doesn't seem to help my understanding either
"\tau _{ik} is a linear combination of all strain components E_{ik}"
Any assistance would be appreciated.
The Attempt at a Solution
I could hazard I guess and say I only sum when r or s equals i or k, and when r=s and i=k. Still unsure if that is correct though.