Great, thank you for the feedback!

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics of a lorry traveling up a slope with specific parameters. Participants calculate the component of the lorry's weight down the slope, the work done against resistive forces, and the power developed by the lorry. There is confusion regarding the calculations for power and the braking distance on a slope compared to a horizontal road. Clarifications are provided on the correct values and formulas to use for these calculations. The conversation concludes with participants confirming their understanding and calculations.
Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
The angle of the slope is 4.8 with the horizontal and the weight of the lorry is 2.4 x 105. A resistive force of 1.2 x 104 down the slope acts on the lorry as it travels up the slope at a constant speed of 15 m/s

(a) Show that the component of the weight of the lorry down the slope is 2.0 x 104:
(b) Calculate the rate at which the truck does work against the resistive forces:
(c) Calculate the power developed by the lorry as it travels up the slope:
(d) Calculate the rate at of gain of potential energy of the lorry:
(e) State and explain how the braking distance of the lorry up the slope compares with that on a horizontal road at the same speed:

The way question c and d are written confuse me a bit. These were my attempts but I am unsure whether they are right or not:

(a) I always have difficulty determining the angle when dividing the components of weight, but: I figured: sin 4.8 x 2.4 x 105 = 2.0 x 104

(b) P = Force x Velocity, P = 1.2 x 104 x 15 = 180,000 J/s

(c) Constant force, hence, force back - resistive forces and the component of weight parallel to the slope - equal the force of the engine, thus: P = F x v, P = 252,000 x 15 = 3,780,000 W

(d) m x g x h, thus: 2.0 x 105 x (sin 4.8 x 15) = 301,240.2 J/s

(e) I think the braking distance will be reduced. On the horizontal road, the resistive forces are equal, provided, as stated in the question, the speed is the same, but, on the slope, there is also the component of the weight parallel to the truck pushing it back which will reduce the braking distance

Thanks in advance,
Peter G.
 

Attachments

  • Physics.jpg
    Physics.jpg
    3.2 KB · Views: 479
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter G. said:
(c) Constant force, hence, force back - resistive forces and the component of weight parallel to the slope - equal the force of the engine, thus: P = F x v, P = 252,000 x 15 = 3,780,000 W

Check the value you used to the force.

ehild
 
Oh, thanks! I think it should be 1.2 x 104 + 2.0 x 104, hence, 32000. Then, 32000 x 15 = 480,000. Is that it? :redface:
 
I think so...

ehild
 
Ok cool. And the other questions seem O.K too?

Peter G.
 
Peter G. said:
Ok cool. And the other questions seem O.K too?

Peter G.

Yes.

ehild
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top