[HELP] Equilibrium of Non - Concurrent Force System

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the force P required to hold a 120lb roller at rest on a rough incline, with a focus on equilibrium in a non-concurrent force system. Participants are analyzing the forces and torques involved in the scenario, referencing a free body diagram for clarity.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the summation of forces and moments, questioning the correctness of their torque calculations and the components of force P. There are discussions about the coordinate system used and the angles involved in the torque calculations.

Discussion Status

Several participants are attempting different calculations for force P and discussing the angles and components involved. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the interior angles between vectors and the proper application of torque equations. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of torque definitions and the relevance of certain forces in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the relationship between the calculated torque and the expected answer, with some noting the challenge of aligning their results with the provided book answer. There is an emphasis on the problem being a 2D scenario, despite some participants referencing 3D concepts.

MrMechanic
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the force P that is required to hold the 120lb roller at rest on the rough incline. (see attachments for Free body diagram)

Homework Equations


Summation of Forces X = 0
Summation of Forces Y = 0
Summation of Moment along A = 0
Moment = Fd

The Attempt at a Solution


well here's what i did...
Summation of moment along A = 0 [clockwise = positive]
-4(Psin15) + 4Pcos15 - 4(120sin15) = 0
P = 4(120sin15) / 4cos15 -4sin15
P = 43.923 lb
Which is wrong.. I've found out that the correct answer is 53.6lb
Can someone explain to me? on where did I go wrong.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    5 KB · Views: 688
Physics news on Phys.org
I understand the contribution of mg sin(15) and it gives me an idea of what you mean with A=0.
What is the component of P that has to counteract this ? I would expect some other angle to come in there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Do you mean Px and Py forces?
 
Well, whatever. What is your coordinate system ?
How is it possible that you can have Psin(15) and Pcos(15) in one and the same summation?
I figured the expression was a torque = 0 relationship because F and N do not appear.
That's fine. It means the summation of forces = 0 relations aren't really relevant equations, right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
If you are breaking up P into its x and y components and then summing torques about A, you are not calculating torques correctly. It is simpler to use the cross product rule for finding the torque of P about A.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Well I've tried this
P = 4(120sin15) / 4sin30
P = 62.12lb
still not yet the correct answer. I really need help on this problem.
 
MrMechanic said:
Well I've tried this
P = 4(120sin15) / 4sin30
P = 62.12lb
still not yet the correct answer. I really need help on this problem.
You have calculated the torque of the roller's weight about A correctly. But you are struggling to calculate the torque of P about A. You should familiarize yourself with the numerous ways to calculate torque. One way is to use the cross product definition: torque = (r)(P)(sin theta), where r is the length of the position vector from the point of application of P to A ( that is, 4 ft.), P, staring as itself, is the force you are trying to find, and theta is the interior angle between the force vector and the position vector. You need to determine that angle. Try again.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
@PhantomJay
do you mean...
torque = 0
0 = 4Psin15 -120sin75
its still incorrect.. damn I am losing my composure.. Hahaha
 
Last edited:
And how do i find the interior angle between the force vector and the position vector..
Thanks for helping again..
 
  • #10
MrMechanic said:
And how do i find the interior angle between the force vector and the position vector..
Thanks for helping again..
Regarding the torque from the weight, the interior angle between the weight vector and position vector r is 15 degrees, right? Now for the torque from P, you might want to put the tail of the force vector P at the center of the roller , you know, keep it parallel just slide it down. Now can you get the angle between P and r vectors? A little geometry, that's all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #11
Getting there. Will you guys be careful with torque? clockwise = positive won't do! Phantom should have told you that torque is a vector. Its magnitude is as he says and its direction is perpendicular to both ##\vec r## and ## m \vec g##. Whether it's +z or -z is awkward for many people, especially those who define a left-handed coordinate system. Torque is defined as ## \vec r \times \vec F##. Turn ## \vec r ## to ## \vec F## and follow the cork screw (in right-handed coord system e.g. x+ = down along slope, y+ is up ##\bot## slope, z+ = "into paper".

ps I can't see the 53.5 popping up. You sure it's right? My fault?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #12
BvU said:
Getting there. Will you guys be careful with torque? clockwise = positive won't do! Phantom should have told you that torque is a vector. Its magnitude is as he says and its direction is perpendicular to both ##\vec r## and ## m \vec g##. Whether it's +z or -z is awkward for many people, especially those who define a left-handed coordinate system. Torque is defined as ## \vec r \times \vec F##. Turn ## \vec r ## to ## \vec F## and follow the cork screw (in right-handed coord system e.g. x+ = down along slope, y+ is up ##\bot## slope, z+ = "into paper".

ps I can't see the 53.5 popping up. You sure it's right? My fault?
i don't get the book answer either. Good point on signage.
If cw is plus, ccw is minus.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #13
Same here.. I've tried lots of different ways to solve for P... And I still can't find a way on how this is done...
What if i sum forces along y. and along x all = 0. Will i still get P? there are three unknowns. N,F, and P. All I need is P. And i still don't get the 3D system. We are just only tackling 2D forces. I have yet to learn those lessons. And by the way thanks again.. I'll try again.
 
  • #14
This is a 2D problem not 3D.
Stop trying to match the ' book ' answer and solve for P. I have already given you a couple tips.
 
  • #15
Agree with Phantom. Balancing only two of the (projected) forces to get |torque|=0 is sufficient here. You didn't need N and F when you chose A as reference point for the torque. Don't need them now, either. Two worries less.

Can we now please get you to take a look at the angles? You projected mg on a line along the slope using 15 degrees. Good. What angle does P make with this same line ? That is really all.

By the way, I have great difficulty imagining what F is and where it comes in. Was it in the original OP or is it only in your rendering thereof?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K