Help explain the following formula? (Young's doubles slit)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the Young's double slit experiment and the equation nλ/d = x/L. The user seeks clarification on why sin θ can be approximated by x/L in this context. It is explained that for small angles, sin θ is approximately equal to tan θ, and thus can be substituted with x/L when the distance L is much larger than the slit separation d. This approximation holds true because, at small angles, the values of sine and tangent converge closely. Understanding this relationship is crucial for accurately interpreting the results of the experiment.
KneelsBoar
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Member advised to use the homework template for posts in the homework sections of PF.
Hello, I'm currently writing a report on young's double slit experiment, and I've used the equation nλ/d = x/L and I was wondering if someone could explain the question? I know how it works, and how to solve for lambda, but could I have some more detail into why it works?

For example, why can Sin θ be substituted by x/L in this case? Would they not give different values?

I appreciate the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KneelsBoar said:
Hello, I'm currently writing a report on young's double slit experiment, and I've used the equation nλ/d = x/L and I was wondering if someone could explain the question? I know how it works, and how to solve for lambda, but could I have some more detail into why it works?

For example, why can Sin θ be substituted by x/L in this case? Would they not give different values?

I appreciate the help.
Hello KneelsBoar. Welcome to PF !

Can you supply a sketch with those quantities included?
 
So, in the limit L>>d you have this equation for young double slit constructive interference:

dsin θ = nλ

Sin θ = nλ/d

Now, if λ/d is small or in other words d is much larger than lambda also sin θ is small

If the sine is small it can be approximate by the tangent that is x/L if by x you mean the vertical distance between the center and the fringe

So yes... x/L is different by the sine, but if you consider small angles the sine can be approximate by the tangent and then by x/L

Example: use the calculator to find sin (2) and tan (2) ( i mean 2 degrees not 2 radians)
 
As the value of x (in mm) is very small as compared to the screen distance L (in m) the angle theta is very small and for small angles sine of that angle is approximately equal to the angle measured in radius.
Alternately for very small angle the arc length and the perpendicular is nearly same and thus theta = arc length/ radius = perpendicular/ hypotenuse
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top