HELP Finding Initial Separation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the initial separation between two charged particles after they are released. The user applied conservation of energy but made an error by not squaring the speed in their calculations. Another participant confirmed that using conservation of momentum could simplify the problem. The user acknowledged the mistake and expressed gratitude for the clarification. The conversation highlights the importance of careful mathematical application in physics problems.
Vettel
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
One particle has a mass of 3.00 10-3 kg and a charge of +7.50 µC. A second particle has a mass of 6.00 10-3 kg and the same charge. The two particles are initially held in place and then released. The particles fly apart, and when the separation between them is 0.100 m, the speed of the 3.00 10-3 kg particle is 130 m/s. Find the initial separation between the particles.


So, I used conservation of energy and figured out this equation;

kq^2/r = kq^2/d +1/2m1v1 + 1/2m2v2
where r is initial separation and m1 is 3.00e-3 and m2 is 6.00e-3.

By F1=F2, m1a1=m2a2 and I found out that v2 is v1/2. Am I right so far?
Then I solve the equation above for r and I got 0.0928 but it was wrong.
Can anybody help me please? I don't have any clue where I screwed up..

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Vettel! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 icons just above the Reply box :wink:)
Vettel said:
By F1=F2, m1a1=m2a2 and I found out that v2 is v1/2. Am I right so far?

Yes. :smile:

(But conservation of momentum would get you there quicker. :wink:)
So, I used conservation of energy and figured out this equation;

kq^2/r = kq^2/d +1/2m1v1 + 1/2m2v2
where r is initial separation and m1 is 3.00e-3 and m2 is 6.00e-3.

your v should be squared. :redface:
 
oh wow.. what a stupid mistake... no wonder I keep getting the wrong answer! Thank you so much! :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top