Help Me Measure Capacitance with ASL MODEL 1055

  • Thread starter Thread starter BerryBoy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance Meter
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on measuring capacitance using the ASL Model 1055 manual displacement meter, which is not typically designed for this purpose. Participants express confusion about using a displacement meter for capacitance measurement, suggesting that a capacitance bridge or LCR meter would be more appropriate for accurate results. One user eventually finds assistance at a university, discovering that the device was incorrectly wired for capacitance measurement. The manual for the ASL Model 1055 is outdated, with hand-drawn circuit diagrams, complicating the process further. Accurate capacitance measurement is crucial for the user's project involving atom counting between metal plates in a vacuum.
BerryBoy
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Not sure where I was supposed to post this; but I think here it will hopefully get the attention of someone who can help me.

I am working on a project where I have to measure capacitance very accurately. I have been given a: ASL MODEL 1055 MANUAL DISPLACEMENT METER. But I've been, along with a colleague, ploughing through the circuit diagrams and instruction manual but cannot find out how to use the device to measure the capacitance of anything :confused:

I was hoping that someone, somewhere can send me something to help.

Sam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you post a link to a soft copy of that manual (like at the manufacturer's website)? I tried google, but no luck with a quick search.
 
Maybe I am missing something, but why are you trying to use a displacement meter to measure capacitance? AFAIK displacement meters are used to measure changes in length (i.e. displacement)
I know there are capacitive displacement meters, but I am not sure there is an easy way to use one to actually measure capacitance.

Generally speaking, if you need measure capacitance accurately you should use a capacitance bridge.
However, an ordinary benchtop LCR meter will probably be accurate enough in most applications.
 
f95toli said:
Maybe I am missing something, but why are you trying to use a displacement meter to measure capacitance? AFAIK displacement meters are used to measure changes in length (i.e. displacement)
I know there are capacitive displacement meters, but I am not sure there is an easy way to use one to actually measure capacitance.

Generally speaking, if you need measure capacitance accurately you should use a capacitance bridge.
However, an ordinary benchtop LCR meter will probably be accurate enough in most applications.

Sorry, I haven't got back to you guys sooner; was a hectic day yesterday. I found someone in the University who knew how to use the equipment. It was wired wrong for measuring capacitance because the guys from the super-conducting labs had hold of it lol.

As for the instruction manual, the thing is soo old the circuit diagrams are hand drawn :-p. But it measures capacitance to 1 x 10^{-7} pF (OMG). I need it accurate because I'm going to investigate a method of couting atoms between two metal plates (in a vacuum container) with various gases.

Thanks for the response though guys.
Sam
 
berkeman said:
Can you post a link to a soft copy of that manual (like at the manufacturer's website)? I tried google, but no luck with a quick search.

Yeah, we tried going onto the manufacturers website for a better copy of the manual, but they don't even list the product we're using.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top