Help me understand static and kinetic friction please

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the roles of static and kinetic friction in a clutch system. The static coefficient of friction is crucial for initiating motion, while the kinetic coefficient governs the force needed to maintain motion. When a clutch is fully engaged and not slipping, the maximum torque capacity is dictated by the static coefficient of friction. The formula provided illustrates how torque capacity is influenced by the coefficient of friction and clamping force. Thus, in a non-slipping scenario, static friction is the key factor in torque transfer from the engine to the gearbox.
knight92
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
Hi, I understand that the static coefficient of friction dictates how much force is required to initiate motion/slippage and kinetic(dynamic) coefficient of friction dictates how much force is required to maintain motion/slippage. So considering a clutch with a friction and drive plate, what is dictating the rigid coupling when the there is no slippage it is transferring all the torque from the engine to the gearbox ?

Using uniform pressure theory the clutch's maximum torque capacity is:

T = (2/3)*u*N*Radius Gyration

where

u = coefficient of friction
N = Clamping force

If the car is in gear with clutch fully engaged (no slippage) then in this case the maximum torque capacity will be determined by the static or kinetic coefficient of friction?

Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If the clutch isn't slipping, it's the coefficient of static friction that determines the maximum torque.

Chet
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top