Help Needed: Writing Fade In/Out Function for Volume Control

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on creating a fade in and fade out function for volume control, focusing on the mathematical aspects. A linear fade was attempted but deemed unsatisfactory, prompting the exploration of power law functions for better audio quality. The proposed volume function incorporates constants and constraints to ensure it starts at a specified volume and reaches zero after a set time. The user is experimenting with parameters like alpha and t_0 to refine the fade effect, with initial tests yielding volume values between 16 and 45. The conversation emphasizes the importance of adjusting these parameters to achieve the desired audio transition.
VMail
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
This more of a maths question rather than a physics one, but I do remember doing something similar is my physics course.

Basically I trying to write a fade in and fade out function
for a volume control but I am stuck on the maths part. Thats where I
need you.

I've tryed a linear fade, but that does not sound good

so y = volume (0-100)
and x = time (0.5)

time is fixed to 0.5sec but can alter slightly if needed

volume will be one value from 0 to 100, but I don't know what the
volume will be until the function is needed
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just putting this PM here because I can't read the formula in the PM

Ambitwistor said:
If a linear scaling doesn't sound good, you might try something that scales as a power of time other than 1. That is, something like t^{-\alpha} for some \alpha>0 (\alpha\neq 1). It will fade faster than linear for \alpha>1, and slower than linear for 0<\alpha<1.

However, you can't just use a straight power law, because it goes to infinity at t=0, and never drops completely to zero. So, you want a power law that's shifted to the left a bit (to be positive at t=0), and also down a bit (to drop to zero at finite t).

So, you want a volume function that looks something like this,

V(t) = A(t+t_0)^{-\alpha} + B[/itex]<br /> <br /> for some constants A, B, and t_0.<br /> <br /> Adding the constraints that you want the volume to have some initial volume at time t=0 (V(0) = V_0), and drop to zero volume after some finite time t=T (V(T) = 0), that leads to a volume function that fades with time like this, <br /> <br /> V(t) = \frac{1-(\frac{1+T/t_0}{1+t/t_0})^\alpha}{1-(1+T/t_0)^\alpha} V_0<br /> <br /> or,<br /> <br /> V(t) = \frac{1-k/(1+t/t_0)^\alpha}{1-k} V_0<br /> <br /> where k = (1+T/t_0)^\alpha -- assuming I haven&#039;t screwed up the algebra; you&#039;ll have to check it.<br /> <br /> You&#039;ll have to play around with the parameters \alpha and t_0 to find something that sounds good. I already mentioned the effect that \alpha has on the fade; larger t_0 values will also make for a slower fade (getting out on the tail end of the power-law decay curve).
 
ok, I'm using

to=0 to 475 (stepping by 25)
and alpha as 1.01
Vo is set at 50

The values that I am getting are 16-45(rounded up)
is this correct?
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Back
Top