Why Does the Integral of 2xCos(Pi*x^2)dx Not Simplify Using Standard Methods?

AI Thread Summary
The integral of 2xCos(πx²)dx cannot be simplified using standard methods due to the complexity of the variable inside the cosine function, which exceeds the first degree. The discussion highlights that substitution is a viable method, specifically using u = πx², leading to the transformation of the integral into a simpler form. The derivative issue arises when attempting to apply standard integral forms to more complex functions like Cos(x²). Integration by parts is also considered but poses challenges with the cosine term. Ultimately, the substitution method is recommended for solving this integral effectively.
Chaz706
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
The General integral for a trig form works whenever the variable inside goes to the first degree.
Example: Sin(x)

But the general integral form for when the variable inside goes beyond the first degree doesn't work.
Example: Sin(x^2), Cos(x^3)

I end up getting an integral whose derivative isn't the original function that I integrated. According to the Fundamental Theory of Calculus, these algorithms can't be correct in these cases.

So how should I solve the integral of 2xCos(Pi*x^2)dx ? I've thought about two things: Substitution and Integration by Parts. Substitution could work, but I get hung up on how to get du. Parts I've tried, but I'm hung up on how to integrate that ugly cosine. Is there another method? Does substitution work? If it does, what's the du? Does Parts work? and how would it work if it does?

Reason why I'm asking: this is one large assignment, and my brain's in knots already from the rest of it.
Furthermore: this is my first post. How do you get that cool coded stuff that makes your integrals look like... integrals?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I think we'll do substitution.

let u = \pi{x^2}
du = 2\pi{x}dx

\frac{du}{\pi} = 2xdx

Now make the substitution:

\int 2x\cos{\pi{x^2}}dx = \frac{1}{\pi}\int\cos{u}du

I think you can take it from here.

Jameson
 
Thanks

Thanks for your help Jameson. And Older Dan too.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top