HELP Rotational equilibrium material

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding rotational equilibrium and the associated equations, particularly in the context of a physics problem involving a window washer on a scaffold. The user seeks clarification on calculating the forces in the ropes supporting the scaffold, given the weights of the window washer and the scaffold itself. Key points include the need to consider torque around a reference point to establish equilibrium, and the realization that the forces in the ropes will differ due to the window washer's position. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the principles of rotational equilibrium to solve for the forces in each rope. Overall, the user is looking for confirmation of their understanding and guidance on tackling similar problems effectively.
misskitty
Messages
737
Reaction score
0
HELP! Rotational equilibrium material!

HELP!---Okay, I am having some issues grasping the concepts of rotational equilibrium and dynamics. Specifically the equations:

T=I*alpha
L=I*omega
T*delta t= delta L
W=T*theta
P=T* omega

And there are also problems that I can't understand so I don't really know where to begin or if I'm doing them correctly. Heres an example:

A 700.0N window washer is standing on a uniform scffold supported by a verticle rope at each end. The scaffold weighs 200.0N and is 3.00m long. What is the force in each rope when the window washer stands 1.00m from one end?

This is what I've got for work:

L=3.00m
Theta=90 degrees
d=1.00m
Force of window washer (Fw)= 700.0N
Force os scaffolding (Fs)= 200.0N
Force of the ropes=Ft

T=Ft*L - Fw*(L/2) - Fs*d
T=Ft*3 - 200*(3/2) - 700*1
T=3Ft - 300 - 700
-3Ft= -300-700
-3Ft/-3= -1000/-3
Ft = 3.33*10^2N

I have no idea if any of it is right...I tried to follow th example in the book and that was as far as I got. There are a ton of similar problems in the book and on my test. If someone could please help... :cry: thank

Sidenote: This is my first Forum post so if the math and such is dificult to understand I'm sorry.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem asked "what is the force in each rope". The whole point is that since the window washer is not standing in the center of the scaffold, the force on the two ropes is NOT the same.

For simplicity, let's say the window washer is 1 meter from the LEFT end rope and, so, 2 meters from the RIGHT end rope. Call the force on the rope on the left side FL and the force on the rope on the right side FR.

The scaffold weighs 200 N and the window washer weighs 700 N so there is a total force downward of 900 N. Since the window washer and scaffold are NOT going down (that's the point of "equilibrium") the force upward, FL+ FR= 900.

Now choose any point as a "reference" point and calculate the total 'torque' around that point- since the scaffold is NOT rotating, that must be 0 (that's the "rotational equilibrium"- it's NOT rotating!). There are four points that are of interest: the left end where the force is FL, the place where the window washer is standing, 1 m away where the force is -700 N, the center of the scaffold where the force is -200 N (since the scaffold is uniform, we can take the force at its center) 1.5 m away from the left end, and the right end, 3 m from the left end, where the force is +FR. Since the torque due to each force is the force times the distance from the reference point, taking the reference point to be one of those, means the distance will be 0 and we will have one less term to worry about.

For example, taking the left end as reference point, and taking "upward" as positive, the total torque is FL(0)-700(1)- 200(1.5)+ FR(3)= 0. That's easy to solve for FR. Once you know that you can use FL+ FR= 900 to solve for FL.
 
I think I think I understand how to do it...but where did the 1.5 come from...FL(0)-700(1)- 200(1.5)+ FR(3)= 0? I just want to make sure that I have this right so I can practice some more problems, take the test and only study one portion of physics instead of this and what my class is doing.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top