Help with 2 pulleys 2 objects.

  • Thread starter Thread starter revolve
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulleys
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving two pulleys and two objects connected by ropes, focusing on the relationship between their accelerations and the tensions in the strings. The context is set in a physics framework, particularly dealing with dynamics and forces on a frictionless surface.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to set up equations for the forces acting on each mass and are questioning the correct interpretation of tension in the ropes. There is a focus on understanding how the movement of one mass affects the other, particularly in terms of distance moved relative to each other.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the system's mechanics. Some have suggested drawing diagrams to clarify the relationships between the movements of the masses and the lengths of the ropes. There is a recognition of confusion regarding the distances moved by each mass, and attempts are being made to clarify these relationships.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the system is idealized with no friction and are trying to visualize the constraints imposed by the lengths of the ropes as the masses move. There is a noted complexity in understanding the relationship between the distances moved by m1 and m2, which is central to the problem.

revolve
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object of mass on a frictionless horizontal table is connected to an object of mass m2 through a very light pulley P1 and a light fixed pulley P2. (a) If a1 and a2 are the accelerations of m1 and m2, respectively, what is the relation between these accelerations? Express (b) the tensions in the strings and (c) the accelerations a1 and a2 in terms of the masses m1 and m2, and g.


Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution


I'm trying to setup the equations correctly. I know I need 2 equations for each object. Right?

Assuming positive direction is down:

\sum Fy = m_{2}g - T = ma_{2}

\sum Fx = T = ma_{1}
 

Attachments

  • 2pulley2obj.jpg
    2pulley2obj.jpg
    4.3 KB · Views: 377
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two ropes in the system. In which rope is the tension T?
 
Okay the diagram was confusing. I thought it was all one rope.

Tension T would be related to P2.

Not sure how I would proceed next.
 
<br /> \sum Fy = m_{2}g - T = ma_{2}<br />

<br /> \sum Fx = T_{1}+T_{2} = ma_{1}<br />

T2 being the tension in P1?
 
revolve said:
<br /> \sum Fy = m_{2}g - T = ma_{2}<br />

<br /> \sum Fx = T_{1}+T_{2} = ma_{1}<br />

T2 being the tension in P1?
Your equation in the x direction is incorrect. But before you go too far, you should first find the relationship between a1 and a2. If m2 drops down 1 meter, how far does m1 move in that same time period?
 
I'm not sure how to determine how far m1 moves relative to m2.
 
revolve said:
I'm not sure how to determine how far m1 moves relative to m2.
Try drawing a little sketch and note that the lengths of the ropes (the one on the right side of P1, and the continuous 'doubled up' rope on the left of P1), do not change in total length as the masses move. Start by assuming the length of the right rope is 2 m long (1 m to P1 to P2 and 1 meter P2 to m2), and assume that the length of the rope left of P1 is 2 m long (1 m from P1 to the wall, and 1 m from P1 to m1). Then use your visual imagination to see what happens if m2 were to nmov down 1 m from ints original position. It does take a close examination to determine this, it seems diffcult at first, but it's not too difficult once you see what's happening.
 
Last edited:
m1 moves half the distance of m2?

or the other way around. Confusing!

Okay P1 is half of P2 so m1 moves half the distance of m2. I think.
 
Last edited:
revolve said:
m1 moves half the distance of m2?

or the other way around. Confusing!

Okay P1 is half of P2 so m1 moves half the distance of m2. I think.
Indeed it is, revolve, it is indeed confusing. Look at it this way: Let the distance, initially, between P1 and P2 be 1 m, and let the distance between P2 and m2 be one meter, initially. Now if m2 were to move down by a meter, that would make P1 crash right into P2, correct? Such that now all the 2 m of rope we assumed, wrapped around P1 to the wall and m1, is now all on the top side of P1, 2 m from the wall. So where does that put m1??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
17K