Help with Balancing a metal rod experiment.

AI Thread Summary
The experiment aims to determine the mass of a metal rod by balancing it with varying weights while ensuring it hovers between clamp jaws. Limitations include the precision of the ruler, which is ±1mm, potentially affecting measurement accuracy. As more mass is added, the distance from the pivot decreases, impacting the relationship between mass and distance. The experiment uses the moment equation and a linear relationship to analyze data. Suggestions for improvement focus on enhancing measurement precision and addressing the setup's stability.
jim_boob
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Help with "Balancing a metal rod" experiment.

1. Homework Statement
I am trying to determine the limitations to my experiment and thus how to improve them.
The experiment's objective is to determine the mass of a metal rod.
The rod is balanced every time another 1kg is added onto the end of the rod.
This means that the rod cannot be touching the clamp. (it has to be 'hovering' in between the jaws of the clamp)
A ruler with a precision of (+-1mm) was used
Ultimately, as the mass on the end increases, the distance (x) will decrease.
A graph was then plotted of (m), mass on the end of the rod against (1/x), 1/the distance between the pivot and the hook.


2. Homework Equations
Moment = Force x distance perpendicular to the line of action of the force
The linear cartesian equation: (y = mx + c) is equivalent to (m = MP(1/x) - M)
where m is the mass hanging on the end of the metal rod, M is the mass of the rod, P is a constant and x is the length from the pivot to the hook (where the mass is hanging).

Any ideas of the limitations and thus the improvements that could be made to this experiment? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please help, coulkd do with this in the next hour.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top