Dirac Trace Algebra: Which Gamma Matrices Matter?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the properties of Dirac gamma matrices and their traces, particularly the rule that the trace of an odd number of gamma matrices is zero. It raises the question of whether the specific types of gamma matrices involved affect this rule. The consensus is that the trace will still be zero due to the odd count, even with different types of gamma matrices present. However, it is noted that gamma^5 requires special consideration due to its unique properties. Overall, standard trace identities for gamma matrices apply as long as the indices are within the specified range.
Maurice7510
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This isn't a homework problem; it's just something I'm working on and I'm a little confused as to how to go about dealing with what I have. I have several traces of Dirac's gamma matrices, and I know that the trace of an odd number of gamma matrices is zero. So my first question is: does it matter *which* gamma matrices? For example, one of my traces has
$$ \gamma_{\nu}\gamma^5\gamma^{\rho}\gamma^{\alpha}\gamma^{\sigma}\gamma^0\gamma^5\gamma^0\gamma^{\lambda}\gamma_{\mu}\gamma^{\beta} $$ Since each $$\gamma^5$$ is a product of 4 gamma matrices, altogether this would be a product of 17, which is odd. But some are $$\gamma^{\mu}$$, some $$\gamma^0$$ and some $$\gamma^5$$ and I'm just not sure what the rules are for this type of thing.

Homework Equations


$$Tr (ABC) = Tr (CAB) = Tr (BCA)$$
$$Tr (A +B) = Tr(A)+Tr(B)$$
$$Tr(aA) = aTr(A)$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I would think that this would, in fact, still be zero because there's an odd number of them. Otherwise I would probably use commutation/anticommutation relations to bring the $$gamma^0$$ and $$\gamma^5$$ together (respectively) to get unity, then just deal with the rest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maurice7510 said:
zero because there's an odd number of them.
And there is your answer.
 
So does that mean that all the standard trace identies for gamma matrices (e.g. in Griffiths or Peskin Schroeder) hold for *any* gamma matrices, regardless of their index?
 
Maurice7510 said:
*any* gamma matrices, regardless of their index?
As long as that index is 0, 1, 2, or 3. You will need to treat ##\gamma^5## differently.
 
Isn't the last one just a product of the first 4?
 
Maurice7510 said:
Isn't the last one just a product of the first 4?
Yes (up to a factor), so you need to treat it differently.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top