Help with finding chirality centres

  • Thread starter Thread starter andrewvidler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chirality
AI Thread Summary
Identifying chiral centers in complex molecules can be challenging, especially when multiple chirality centers are present. A carbon atom is considered chiral if it has four different substituents. To determine chirality, one should evaluate the substituents by moving outward from the chiral carbon and comparing the atoms encountered. If the paths to two substituents converge or show no differences, the carbon is not chiral. Understanding how far to trace along branches to identify different substituents is crucial for accurate chirality assessment.
andrewvidler
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am having a lot of trouble with this. Does anyone know how to identify the chiral centres in the following attached molecule?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled-1.png
    Untitled-1.png
    6.3 KB · Views: 484
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What methods of recognizing chiral carbons do you know?

Please note that attaching .doc files is not a good idea - many people are reluctant to open them, as they can contain viruses. In such a case best approach is to attach an image.

Edit: I think I am bored, I have replaced doc with png in your post.
 
Hi Borek - i know the basics, ie a carbon with 4 different substituents is a chiral carbon, however i have been given complex molecules that have multiple chirality centres and i cannot see them. For instance the attached image has 4 - but i can't see why.
 

Attachments

  • index.jpg
    index.jpg
    1.9 KB · Views: 410
Perhaps you are thrown off by cycles?

Select an atom, move out from it in each direction and compare atoms on the way. If you get to the same place from both sides and there were no differences on the way - atom is not chiral.

Try it on some simple molecules first, say cyclohexanol and 2-methylcyclohexanol.
 
Hi - how about this one? I am confused as to what constitutes a different group. I mean how far do go along the separate branches from the ceontre to say that is a differernt substituent.
this is one where it days there are 3. I know where they are but i don't see why
 

Attachments

  • menthol.jpg
    menthol.jpg
    1.3 KB · Views: 466
andrewvidler said:
how far do go along the separate branches from the centre to say that is a differernt substituent

Either till you "meet" or till you find a difference - whichever comes first.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top