Help with understanding Shear Force and Bending Moment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating shear force and bending moment in various diagrams related to beam mechanics. The normal force at point A is calculated as 2Fcos(30), while the shear force at point B is noted to be zero, highlighting the distinction between shear force and net force. The bending moment at point C is expressed as -L/2 * F*cos(30), and at the support, it is 2LF. The shear force at point A is likely intended to be 2Fsin(30), although F could also be justified depending on the beam's shape. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the definitions and calculations related to shear force and bending moments in static systems.
NoobeAtPhysics
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement





What is:

i) In diagram 1, the magnitude of the normal force at A

ii) In diagram 2, the magnitude of the shear force at B

iii) In diagram 3, the magnitude of the bending moment at C

iv) In diagram 4, the magnitude of the bending moment at the support

v) In diagram 1, the magnitude of the shear force at A

25uha92.png


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



i) 2Fcos(30)

ii) 0

iii)-L/2 * F*cos(30)

iv) 2LF

v) 2Fsin(30)



Any help or advice would be great!

Thanks,
Pete
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm any ideas?
 
NoobeAtPhysics said:
i) 2Fcos(30)
Do they mean normal to the wall or normal to the beam? (I'm really not sure.)
ii) 0
Shear force is not the same as net force.
A shear force is a couple acting along parallel surfaces of a volume. So it consists of a pair of equal and opposite forces acting along parallel lines. These create a torque if about an axis, but in this case they are being applied along parallel surfaces of a rigid volume.
But AFAIK, one doesn't normally speak of the magnitude of a shear force, unless you simply mean the magnitude of each force of the couple. More usually one speaks of shear stress. See e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shear_stress.
(But I don't think the explanation there is very clear. It defines:
A = the cross-sectional area of material with area parallel to the applied force vector,
but a force vector only defines a line, so being parallel to it does not serve to define the area. A more precise way would be as the torque divided by the volume.)​
None of that is going to help here since we don't know all the dimensions of the beam.
I've a nasty suspicion they're looking for the answer F sin(30), but one could equally justify F. It all depends what shape you care to make the sheared volume. For a beam, I suppose it's natural to take a rectangular volume with one axis along the beam.
iii)-L/2 * F*cos(30)
In statics, if you want the bending moment at a point of a beam you only have to consider the part of the beam from that point to one end. Just add up the moments of all the forces on that part of the beam about that point. It doesn't matter which end you choose because, things being static, the two sums of moments must be equal and opposite. In this case, it's obviously simpler to pick the free end.
iv) 2LF
Yes.
v) 2Fsin(30)
That's probably what's wanted, but you could also defend 2F.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top