Helping out with pulley diameter calculation

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the required pulley diameter for reducing motor speed from 1800 RPM to 80 RPM, the relationship n1 d1 = n2 d2 can be used, where n1 is the motor RPM and n2 is the desired RPM. The ratio of n1 to n2 is 22.5, indicating that the driven pulley diameter should be 22.5 times larger than the motor pulley diameter. However, this large ratio raises concerns about potential belt slippage, suggesting the need for a toothed belt or multiple pulleys to achieve the desired reduction more effectively. Alternatives like a gear reduction system or chain drive can also provide more flexibility in adjusting the speed ratio. Proper selection of components is crucial to ensure efficient power transmission without slippage.
Giannakoulis
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hey guys.. Sorry for my english, i'am only 16 and it's not my parent language. I need help about a problem on mechanical engineering, and i really appreciated if you can help me out. I assume that I've got a moter currents which gives me out 220-230 Volt trend, and has 1800 bends per minute. Now i want to know how much diameter should have a pulley to put it on another machine. I want this machine to give 80 bends per minute. And what pulley should i put in the original current moter to suit them. The starting transmission from the moter will be done with a belt.. For more details or clarifications, just ask me..
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello Giannakoulis, :welcome:

Basically you have ##n_1 d_1 = n_2 d_2## (because the belt speed is the same on both pulleys). In this expression
##n_1 = ## motor rpm (revolutions per minute)
##d_1 = ## pulley diameter on motor axis
##d_2 = ## pulley diameter on driven axis
##n_2 = ## driven axis rpm​

In your case you have ##n_1/n_2 = 22.5## so you want ##\ \ \ \ \ ## pulley diameter on driven axis = 22.5 times pulley diameter on motor axis
 
  • Like
Likes Giannakoulis
thanks a lot!
 
BvU said:
In your case you have n1/n2=22.5n1/n2=22.5n_1/n_2 = 22.5 so you want pulley diameter on driven axis = 22.5 times pulley diameter on motor axis

That is a large ratio. It is possible that the belt will slip on the small pulley. The maximum power you can transmit is limited by friction and the "contact angle" (how far around the pulley the belt wraps). You might need to use a toothed belt?
 
CWatters said:
That is a large ratio. It is possible that the belt will slip on the small pulley. The maximum power you can transmit is limited by friction and the "contact angle" (how far around the pulley the belt wraps). You might need to use a toothed belt?
Or a series of pulleys with a smaller reduction in each. If my maths is right three pairs with a reduction of 3, 3 and 2.5 gets you 22.5:1.
 
I would probably look at a 10:1 or 25:1 gear reduction.. with the 10:1 reduction you'd need a 2.25:1 belt drive (2" to 4.5" or so), and with the 25:1 the driven pulley would have to be just a bit smaller than the motor pulley.. If you use a chain drive from the gear to the machine, you can adjust the ratio there as well (may be easier and more accurate than changing pulley sizes)
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top