Hershel experiment regarding IR radiation

AI Thread Summary
The Hershel experiment demonstrated that red light, despite having lower energy than violet light, can produce a higher temperature reading on a thermometer due to its greater intensity and the strong infrared component in sunlight. Light itself does not have a temperature; rather, the temperature reading depends on the intensity and absorption characteristics of the light interacting with the thermometer. While ultraviolet light has higher energy per photon, its lower intensity in sunlight results in a lesser heating effect compared to red light. The experiment highlights that the notable heating effect occurs even when no visible light is detected. Ultimately, the interaction of light with materials and the specific conditions of the experiment are crucial for understanding temperature readings.
mildpiranha
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have been struggling with the following; (apologies if this is a simple question)

After reading the Hershel experiment where with a prism light was used to split white light into a spectrum of colours and the red light was warmer than the violet light, then he placed a detector past the red and discovered infrared where his detector registered a higher temperature.

My question is why does the red light have a higher temperature than the violet, when the violet light has a higher energy?

Also if he placed a detector past the violet section in the ultraviolet region would he have detected a colder temperature?

Thank you for your help
 
Science news on Phys.org
Light does not have a temperature.

The temperature of the thermometer depends on the light intensity (and the absorption coefficient of the surface). Sunlight has a strong infrared component, the intensity in the ultraviolet range is low (and below a certain wavelength, the prism will just absorb the light).

The energy per photon is larger for ultraviolet light.
 
Thank you for your response.

To clarify does that mean that in the case of this experiment that the red light increased the temperature of the thermometer more than the violet light did as its intensity was greater?

So, if I had equal intensities of red light on one thermometer and violet light on another thermometer would the thermometer which had the violet light on have a greater intensity due to the greater energy of violet light?
 
mildpiranha said:
To clarify does that mean that in the case of this experiment that the red light increased the temperature of the thermometer more than the violet light did as its intensity was greater?
Right.

So, if I had equal intensities of red light on one thermometer and violet light on another thermometer would the thermometer which had the violet light on have a greater intensity due to the greater energy of violet light?
Not in general. Intensity already accounts for this difference, its unit is W/m^2 (power per area). The area of the thermometer stays the same, and the absorbed power determines the temperature reading.

A quantative analysis has to be more careful: The thermometer will always receive light in some wavelength range, where the size of this range depends on the wavelength-dependency of the refractive index of the prism, and the received power depends on this size. Also, not the total intensity hitting the thermometer will get absorbed, and this fraction can depend on the wavelength. But those are technical details - the interesting result of the experiment was the notable heating effect where no light was visible.
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...

Similar threads

Back
Top