Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Taylor_1989
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagram
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the relationship between luminosity, size, and surface temperature of a star using the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram principles. The equation presented is $$ \frac{l}{l_0}=(\frac{R}{R_0})^2(\frac{T}{T_0})^4 $$, where $$L_0$$, $$R_0$$, and $$T_0$$ represent the luminosity, radius, and surface temperature of the Sun, respectively. The user successfully applies the formula $$F=\frac{L}{4 \pi R^2}$$ and seeks confirmation on whether substituting the Sun's values is sufficient to complete the derivation. The consensus is that this substitution is indeed the correct approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram
  • Familiarity with stellar luminosity and temperature concepts
  • Knowledge of the Stefan-Boltzmann Law
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Stefan-Boltzmann Law in detail
  • Explore the implications of the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram in stellar evolution
  • Learn about the different types of stars and their characteristics based on luminosity and temperature
  • Investigate how to calculate stellar distances using luminosity and brightness
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, astrophysics researchers, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of stellar properties and the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram.

Taylor_1989
Messages
400
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


From first principles show that the relationship between the luminosity, size
and surface temperature of a star can be expressed as:

$$ \frac{l}{l_0}=(\frac{R}{R_0})^2(\frac{T}{T_0})^4 $$

Homework Equations


$$L_0$$= Luminosity of sun
$$R_0$$=radius of sun
$$T_0$$=surface temp of sun

$$F=\frac{L}{4 \pi R^2}$$
$$F=\sigma T^4$$

The Attempt at a Solution


$$F=\frac{L}{4 \pi R^2}$$

$$L=4\pi R^2F =4\pi R^2\sigma T^4$$

So this is as far as I get. Is it just a matter of doing a luminosity for the sun and then just putting $$L/L_0 $$ or is there more to it. Have I got the wrong end of the stick. Any help would be very much appreciated. Thank in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it just a matter of doing a luminosity for the sun and then just putting \rm L/L0 ?

Yes. That's really all there is to it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K