Hidden object at bottom of pool with a raft.

  • Thread starter Thread starter pdeco1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves determining the minimum radius of a raft that can completely hide a diamond located at the bottom of a cylindrical pool, which is 3 meters deep and 10 meters in diameter. The critical angle was calculated using the formula Theta(c) = sin^-1(n2/n1), yielding a critical angle of 48.7 degrees. Using trigonometric relationships, the radius of the raft was found to be approximately 3.42 meters. Attention to significant figures in calculations is crucial for accuracy in the final result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of critical angle in optics
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions (SOHCAHTOA)
  • Knowledge of cylindrical geometry
  • Ability to perform calculations with significant figures
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the critical angle and its applications in optics
  • Practice trigonometric calculations involving angles and distances
  • Explore cylindrical geometry and its properties
  • Learn about significant figures and their importance in scientific calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics or mathematics, particularly those focusing on optics and geometry, as well as educators looking for practical examples of trigonometric applications.

pdeco1
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A thief hides a diamond in the center of the bottom of a cylindrical pool of water of depth 3m and diameter 10m by placing a circular raft on the surface of the water. The center of the raft is directly above the diamond. What is the minimum radius of the raft that will completely hide the diamond?


Homework Equations


Critical angle formula.
SOHCAHTOA

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the critical angle Theta(c) = sin^-1(n2/n1) = 1/1.33 = 48.7 degrees.


The depth of the pool is 3m. tan48.7 = O/A = 3(tan48.7) = 3.41, which is the radius of the raft.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump - Am I doing this problem correctly?
 
I get a raft radius of 3.42m. It looks like your method is good, but you may want to be careful about carrying enough significant figures through the calculations right to the end (where the result is rounded).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
30K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K