Hoffman, Kunze Linear Algebra book: which topics to study QM?

AI Thread Summary
Self-studying quantum mechanics requires a solid understanding of linear algebra, with key topics including linear equations, vector spaces, linear transformations, inner product spaces, and operators on inner product spaces. While some chapters may seem less critical, such as those on normal forms and polynomials, they are ultimately interconnected and beneficial for a comprehensive understanding. It's advised to cover all theorems and concepts, even if some technical proofs can be omitted. The recommended textbook, Hoffman and Kunze, serves as a sufficient foundation for linear algebra, particularly as a prerequisite for quantum physics. Additional topics like functional analysis, tensor algebra, and representation theory are also important in quantum mechanics. Utilizing supplementary resources and asking well-prepared questions can enhance the learning experience. Overall, persistence and curiosity are essential for mastering these concepts.
sphyrch
Messages
37
Reaction score
9
I've started self-studying quantum mechanics. It's clear from google searching and online Q.Mech lectures, I'll need to understand linear algebra first. I'm starting with finite-dimensional linear algebra and Hoffman, Kunze is one of the widely recommended textbooks for that.

I need help regarding which topics I should cover to properly learn linear algebra prerequisite for quantum physics. Here's the table of contents:

https://pastebin.com/6EE4NdYA

From what little I know, I'm pretty sure that the chapters: Linear Equations, Vector Spaces, Linear Transformations, Inner Product Spaces and Operators on Inner Product Spaces are necessary. I'd be grateful if someone could tell me about the remaining chapters.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's hard to tell one or another chapter could be omitted, as linear algebra is basically part of the very basics in physics. You probably won't need to know, how some normal forms can be achieved, because you can always look it up, but that they exists and what they do is important, esp. the Jordan normal form. Similar is true for the other chapters, e.g. modules and Graßmann rings listed under determinants. Sooner or later you will likely meet all of those concepts. Polynomials looks as it could be left out, but then we find algebras and ideals in it. And bilinear forms are essential, too, as they occur at so many different occasions.

What you can do is leave out some technical proofs or exercises. I cannot really recommend it, but I wouldn't omit any theorems instead. Linear algebra is normally not very hard. The main difficulty is that our school systems are very focused on calculus and algebraic concepts often appear a bit strange at the beginning. However, it is necessary to get a feeling about algebraic objects, esp. vector spaces of all kind.
 
fresh_42 said:
It's hard to tell one or another chapter could be omitted, as linear algebra is basically part of the very basics in physics. You probably won't need to know, how some normal forms can be achieved, because you can always look it up, but that they exists and what they do is important, esp. the Jordan normal form. Similar is true for the other chapters, e.g. modules and Graßmann rings listed under determinants. Sooner or later you will likely meet all of those concepts. Polynomials looks as it could be left out, but then we find algebras and ideals in it. And bilinear forms are essential, too, as they occur at so many different occasions.

What you can do is leave out some technical proofs or exercises. I cannot really recommend it, but I wouldn't omit any theorems instead. Linear algebra is normally not very hard. The main difficulty is that our school systems are very focused on calculus and algebraic concepts often appear a bit strange at the beginning. However, it is necessary to get a feeling about algebraic objects, esp. vector spaces of all kind.

Thanks! Since you've specified that none of the chapters should be omitted altogether, I will at the very least cover all the theorems - I suppose it's important to know how to at least apply them, if not some of their proofs.

One more thing I want to clarify - are there any important topics that I should know of, which not covered in the book? Or is the book sufficient as a first course in linear algebra (SPECIFICALLY as a prerequisite for quantum physics)?
 
sphyrch said:
... are there any important topics that I should know of, which not covered in the book?
Yes, as functional analysis (operators, Hilbert- and Banach spaces, function spaces), tensor algebra and differential geometry also play a major role in QM as well as some basics about representation theory. They cannot always be strictly separated.
Or is the book sufficient as a first course in linear algebra (SPECIFICALLY as a prerequisite for quantum physics)?
Also yes with emphasis on first course. I would even say, it is necessarily the starting point. The thing is to find a way such that you don't have to become a mathematician in order to become a physicist. However, the good ones are both. It might be more important to have some books (or e-prints nowadays) where you can look up topics you might have forgotten. Nobody knows everything, but to know where to look is at least as important. At the beginning the mountain to climb always looks huge, but once you've understood the concepts behind, things get easier and many facts will get more absorbed than learned.

And of course you can always return here and ask questions. And as a hint for these: the better prepared the questions are, the better the answers will be. Make use of our homework section and the (automatically inserted) template there. It can be a real good tutorial and is far better than being stuck for too long at a certain issue. We also have some insight articles on how to self-study certain fields, e.g.

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/problems-self-studying/
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/how-to-study-mathematics/
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/self-study-algebra-linear-algebra/

This interview might also be of interest:
http://www.ams.org/publications/journals/notices/201707/rnoti-p718.pdf

In any case: good luck, success and don't forget the fun!
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
7K
Back
Top