Holonomic constraints and non-holonomic system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the uniqueness of a non-holonomic system involving a disk with a net turn, highlighting its distinct behavior. Examples of non-holonomic systems include the movement of a cat in mid-air and astronauts using similar techniques to adjust their orientation. The conversation emphasizes that non-holonomic systems, like the one described, have constraints that are not integrable, affecting their state evolution based on the path taken. The Pfaffian form is mentioned as a method to rigorously demonstrate the non-holonomic nature of such systems. Overall, the discussion clarifies the characteristics and examples of non-holonomic systems.
guv
Messages
122
Reaction score
22
Homework Statement
A disk of uniform mass density, mass M, and radius R sits at rest on a frictionless floor. The disk is attached to the floor by a frictionless pivot at its center, which keeps the center of the disk in place, but allows the disk to rotate freely. An ant of mass m ##\ll## M is initially standing on the edge of the disk; ou may give your answers to leading order in m/M.

The ant walks an angular displacement ##\theta## along the edge of the disk. Then it walks radially inward by a distance h ##\ll## R, tangentially through an angular displacement −##\theta##, then back to its starting point on the disk. Assume the ant walks with constant speed v.

Through what net angle does the disk rotate throughout this process, to leading order in h/R?
Relevant Equations
The disk will rotate $$\frac{4 m h \theta}{M R}$$
The solution is given. What makes this solution unique is that there is a net turn for the disk. The note of the solution mentions this system is non-holonomic. My question is that are there other non-holonomic examples. What makes this particular set up non-holonomic? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure about your holonomics question, but the process is essentially the same as for cat dropped upside down. It spreads out its back legs, pulls in its front legs, and twists. The back legs having greater MoI twist through the smaller angle. It can then swap over the leg postures and twist the other way.
Net result, cat turns in mid air.
Astronauts use the same trick.
For the ant on the disc, it could walk in small circles near one edge of the disc and the disc would gradually rotate the other way.
 
That's right, the cat example is also non-holonomic. I think I am starting to get the idea. Looks like I would need to work through the Pfaffian form of the system to rigorously show it's non-holonomic. Any system where the constraint ##f(x_i, t) = 0## is not integrable is non-holonomic because such system's evolution through states depends on the path of evolution.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top