Hooke's Law vs. Conservation of Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of Hooke's Law and the conservation of energy in solving two physics problems involving springs. For the first question, the correct approach is to use Hooke's Law to determine the compression of the springs under a static load. In the second question, conservation of energy is appropriate to find how far a ball falls before being stopped by the spring. Misapplying the methods leads to incorrect results, specifically a factor of two difference in both cases. Understanding the context of each problem is crucial for selecting the appropriate method.
keroberous
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I can never quite remember when solving problems with elastic materials whether I should be using Hooke's Law or conservation of energy. Below are two sample problems.
Relevant Equations
Hooke's Law: ##F=kx##
Elastic Potential Energy: ##E_e=\frac{1}{2}kx^2##
Gravitational Potential Energy: ##E_g=mgh##
Here are the two questions I want to compare:

1. A student of mass 62 kg stands on an upholstered chair containing springs, each of force constant 2.4 × 103 N/m. If the student is supported equally by six springs, what is the compression of each spring?

2. A 0.20-kg ball attached to a vertical spring of force constant 28 N/m is released from rest from the unstretched equilibrium position of the spring. Determine how far the ball falls, under negligible air resistance, before being brought to a momentary stop by the spring.

I can get the right answer for both questions, by using Hooke's law for number 1 and conservation of energy for question 2. My question is if I didn't know what the answers were, how would I choose the method? By using the incorrect method I'm off by a factor of two in both cases (bigger in 1 and smaller in 2).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
keroberous said:
Here are the two questions I want to compare:

1. A student of mass 62 kg stands on an upholstered chair containing springs, each of force constant 2.4 × 103 N/m. If the student is supported equally by six springs, what is the compression of each spring?

2. A 0.20-kg ball attached to a vertical spring of force constant 28 N/m is released from rest from the unstretched equilibrium position of the spring. Determine how far the ball falls, under negligible air resistance, before being brought to a momentary stop by the spring.

I can get the right answer for both questions, by using Hooke's law for number 1 and conservation of energy for question 2. My question is if I didn't know what the answers were, how would I choose the method? By using the incorrect method I'm off by a factor of two in both cases (bigger in 1 and smaller in 2).
In question 1, you are asked to determine the equilibrium position of the system (student plus springs). In question 2, you are asked how far the ball would fall before it reverses direction. This is not the same as the equilibrium position and would in fact be twice as far from the initial position as the equilibrium position.
Each method, used correctly, should give you the right answer to each question. If you were to post your solutions, we could comment on where you went wrong.
 
tnich said:
Each method, used correctly, should give you the right answer to each question.
But... in 1, it is a static arrangement. A conservation law is only directly useful when something has changed.
Conversely, in 2, it is not obvious how to find the force when the velocity is zero.
To apply energy in 1 or Hooke in 2 seems to require performing the conversion, i.e. integrating Hooke or differentiating energy.
 
Any reason you can't turn 1) into a dynamic situation and equate the PE lost by the man with the PE gained by the spring...

mgh=0.5kh^2

Solve for h.
 
CWatters said:
Any reason you can't turn 1) into a dynamic situation and equate the PE lost by the man with the PE gained by the spring...
Yes, there is a reason. That will give twice the correct answer, as @keroberous found and @tnich explained.
 
  • Like
Likes CWatters
Palm -> Face
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top