Horizontal component of the Coriolis force

AI Thread Summary
The Coriolis force acting on an object moving on Earth is defined by the equation Fcor = 2m(v × ω), where m is the object's mass, v is its velocity, and ω is Earth's angular velocity. The discussion questions whether the horizontal component of this force can be expressed as 2mωv sin θ, with θ being the angle between ω and v. It is clarified that this formula represents the magnitude of the Coriolis force, not specifically its horizontal component. Acknowledgment of the misunderstanding leads to a suggestion to review the relevant chapter for better comprehension. Understanding the distinction between the total force and its components is crucial for accurate application of the Coriolis effect.
MatinSAR
Messages
673
Reaction score
204
Homework Statement
Show that the horizontal component of the Coriolis force is independent of the direction of motion of the particle on Earth's surface.(The particle is moving on a horizontal plane.)
Relevant Equations
Newton's Laws in non-inertial reference frames.
The coriolis force that acts on the object moving on the Earth is: $$F_{cor}=2m(\vec v \times \vec \omega)$$##F_{cor}## is the Coriolis force, ##m## is the mass of the object, ## \vec{v}## is the velocity of the object in the Earth frame, and ## \vec{\omega}## is the angular velocity of the Earth.

Is it true to say that the horizontal component of this force is equal to ##2m \omega v \sin \theta## where ##\theta## is the angle between ##\vec \omega## and ##\vec v##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MatinSAR said:
Is it true to say that the horizontal component of this force is equal to ##2m \omega v \sin \theta## where ##\theta## is the angle between ##\vec \omega## and ##\vec v##?
That is the formula for the magnitude of the Coriolis force. Not for its horizontal component.
 
jbriggs444 said:
That is the formula for the magnitude of the Coriolis force. Not for its horizontal component.
Thank you for pointing out my mistake. I think I need to reread this chapter before trying to solve.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top