Horizontal component of the Coriolis force

AI Thread Summary
The Coriolis force acting on an object moving on Earth is defined by the equation Fcor = 2m(v × ω), where m is the object's mass, v is its velocity, and ω is Earth's angular velocity. The discussion questions whether the horizontal component of this force can be expressed as 2mωv sin θ, with θ being the angle between ω and v. It is clarified that this formula represents the magnitude of the Coriolis force, not specifically its horizontal component. Acknowledgment of the misunderstanding leads to a suggestion to review the relevant chapter for better comprehension. Understanding the distinction between the total force and its components is crucial for accurate application of the Coriolis effect.
MatinSAR
Messages
673
Reaction score
204
Homework Statement
Show that the horizontal component of the Coriolis force is independent of the direction of motion of the particle on Earth's surface.(The particle is moving on a horizontal plane.)
Relevant Equations
Newton's Laws in non-inertial reference frames.
The coriolis force that acts on the object moving on the Earth is: $$F_{cor}=2m(\vec v \times \vec \omega)$$##F_{cor}## is the Coriolis force, ##m## is the mass of the object, ## \vec{v}## is the velocity of the object in the Earth frame, and ## \vec{\omega}## is the angular velocity of the Earth.

Is it true to say that the horizontal component of this force is equal to ##2m \omega v \sin \theta## where ##\theta## is the angle between ##\vec \omega## and ##\vec v##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MatinSAR said:
Is it true to say that the horizontal component of this force is equal to ##2m \omega v \sin \theta## where ##\theta## is the angle between ##\vec \omega## and ##\vec v##?
That is the formula for the magnitude of the Coriolis force. Not for its horizontal component.
 
jbriggs444 said:
That is the formula for the magnitude of the Coriolis force. Not for its horizontal component.
Thank you for pointing out my mistake. I think I need to reread this chapter before trying to solve.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top