How Accurate Are Crude Estimates in Electric Dipole Transitions?

Fluffy86
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey
have another problem with one of my exercises

Homework Statement


Make a crude estimate for the mean life of an electric dipole transition

in a atom E_\gamma = 10 eV
in a nucleus E_\gamma = 1 MeV


Homework Equations


W_{\alpha \beta} &amp;=&amp; \frac{4}{3} \frac{e^2}{\hbar^4 c^3} E_\gamma^3 |&lt;\beta|\vec{x}|\alpha&gt;|^2 \<br /> &amp;=&amp; \frac{4}{3} \frac{\alpha}{\hbar^3 c^2} E_\gamma^3 |&lt;\beta|\vec{x}|\alpha&gt;|^2
with the first \alpha beeing the fine structure constant \alpha = \frac{e^2}{\hbar c}=\frac{1}{137}


The Attempt at a Solution


I am not quite sure how to estimate the last factor in the equation. Since we just have to do a crude estimate i don't think we have to calculate it with real wavefunctions(dont know if there are even wavefunctions for nuclei)
So my first thought was since |&lt;\beta|\vec{x}|\alpha&gt;|^2 has the dimension of a length^2 I inserted the typical lengthscales of an atom, the Bohr radius, and for the nucleus 1fm.
For the atom I get W= 1.1 10^9 1/s and for the nucleus 3.82 *10^14 1/s.
The lifetime is just the inverse of these. But I think the lifetime is then too small, I have something like 10^(-8) in my mind for the atom.
Anyone has a idea how to estimate it in a better way?

Bye
Fluffy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Crude estimates of this type are usually handled with the Uncertainty principle.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top