How Accurate is the 1/2gt² Formula for Calculating Drop Height?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the accuracy of the formula 1/2gt² for calculating the height of a drop, specifically using a football as the dropped object. The calculation yielded a height of approximately 2.83 meters based on a drop time of 0.76 seconds, which raises concerns about the accuracy of the time measurement. Participants noted that for a height of around 5 meters, the drop time should be closer to one second, indicating potential miscalculation or measurement error. The importance of considering human error and the method of dropping the object was also highlighted. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for precise measurements and understanding of the formula's application.
Greiver
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This is one of the questions on my college intro. to physics course lab.

use the shortest time(or shortest average time) to calculate the height of the drop point from the ground, Explain the choice of time to calculate the height of the drop

*object dropped was a football.

1/2gt^2




1/2 (9.8m/s^2)(0.76s)^2
=2.83024m


I don't know if I am headed in the right direction with this problem any input would be appreciated, although I have to point out that logically the height is approximately 5 or so meters could this be a miscalculation ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's the correct formula for an object dropped from rest with no air resistance. You probably didn't measure the time correctly...If the height was 5 meters, the time would have to be at least about a second.
 
PhanthomJay said:
That's the correct formula for an object dropped from rest with no air resistance. You probably didn't measure the time correctly...If the height was 5 meters, the time would have to be at least about a second.

looking at the average time for three trials with a football, although in doing the experiment i don't recall taking note of how it was dropped and the possibility for human error in this experiment. Thanks for the reply though it is very much appreciated.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top