How Accurate Is the Calculated Velocity of a Free Falling Tennis Ball?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the final velocity of a tennis ball hit at a 30° angle from a height of 2 meters, with an initial speed of 5.0 m/s, while neglecting air resistance. The user initially calculated the final speed as 8.3 m/s but questioned whether this discrepancy from the expected 8.0 m/s was due to rounding errors. Responses highlighted the need to correctly apply the sine function for vertical speed and emphasized incorporating gravitational acceleration into the calculations. Additionally, it was noted that the final answer should represent both speed and direction to be complete. Overall, the calculations require careful attention to trigonometric functions and gravitational effects for accuracy.
luysion
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A tennis ball is hit down at
an angle of 30° below the horizontal from a height of 2 m. It
is initially traveling at 5.0 m s−1. What is the velocity of the
ball when it hits the ground if we can neglect air resistance?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


ok so I actually attempted it and want to know if my answer is correct as the actual answer is 8.0 i got 8.3, is this just due to rounding errors or is my working wrong;

So I got the final horizontal and vertical components and sumed them to get the resultant/final speed of the ball.

so for the horizontal speed = cos 30deg x 5 = 4.33
for the initial vertical speed = sin 30deg x 5 = 2.5
final vertical speed = 7.5
then sqtr of 4.33^2 + 7.5^2 to give me 8.3
is this correct?

thanks to anyone that checks much appriciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Wait, so you multiplied sin 30 * 5 and got 7.5? Are you sure that you put that into your calculator right? The sine of 30 should come out to be 0.5...

You also need to factor the acceleration due to gravity in there somehow. Or did you already put that in somehow with your 7.5 and just not write it?

Also, for it to be a complete velocity and not just a speed, you'd need to include the angle below the horizontal. ;) Hope this helps!
 
I'm not sure this is done right, but the actual work the way you did it yields 8.66. At least according to my TI-84
 
sorry i typed it wrong haha 7.5 is the final vertical velocity 2.5 is the initial
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top