How are these derived for an inclined plane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter catzmeow
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving equations for mechanical advantage and efficiency for an inclined plane. The mechanical advantage is expressed as 1/(sin(theta) + mu_k*cos(theta)), while efficiency is given by 1/(1 + mu_k*cot(theta)). Participants suggest visualizing the inclined plane with a mass and analyzing the forces involved in pushing the mass up the ramp compared to lifting it vertically. The calculations involve comparing the force needed to lift the mass straight up to the force required to push it up the incline. The conversation emphasizes understanding the relationships between these forces to derive the equations accurately.
catzmeow
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm utterly lost on this and would appreciate any help!

I'm given mechanical advantage= 1/(sin(theta)+mu_k*cos(theta))

And efficiency = 1/(1+mu_k*cot(theta))

These are for an inclined plane and theta is not specified, I'm just supposed to show how those equations were derived.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might start by drawing an incline plane at an angle of theta with a mass on it, call it m as it doesn't matter in the end. Then draw the forces required to push the mass up the ramp. Compare this with the force required to raise the mass straight up. This should be the mechanical advantage.
 
Thanks barryj! I did that and now I have MA= (Mgsin(theta))/(input force-mgcos(theta)...

Is this close(er)?
 
Oops I meant all that I have equal to mu_k
 
Well, I think the MA = force required to lift the mass with no incline divided by the force required to push the mass up the incline. So, the force required to lift the mass with no incline would be mg, now you figure out the force required to push the mass up the incline and do the division.
 
Oh ok- that makes since. Thanks Barryj!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top