How Can A Be Calculated for Uniform Electric Field in a Spherical Shell?

AI Thread Summary
To achieve a uniform electric field within a non-conducting spherical shell, the value of the constant A must be determined based on the charge distribution and the point charge at the center. The electric field E in the shell is influenced by both the central charge and the volume charge density, which is defined as ρ = A/r. The net electric field must remain constant, leading to the equation E_charge = -E_volume. The discussion highlights the application of Gauss' Law to relate the electric flux through the shell to the enclosed charge, but the user expresses uncertainty about the next steps in the calculation. Understanding how to integrate the charge density and apply Gauss' Law is essential for solving the problem effectively.
paralian
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(Note: Don't worry about significant digits. I just want to be able to do the question and will worry about significant digits on the exam.)

In the figure below, a non-conducting spherical shell of inner radius a=2.00cm and outer radius b=2.40cm has (within its thickness) a positive volume density \rho=A/r, where A is a constant and r is the distance from the centre of the shell. In addition, a small ball of charge q=45.0 fC is located at the centre.

What value should A have if the electric field in the shell (a\leqr\leqb) is to be uniform?

(See attached file for the picture. sorry it isn't very good. That's a "q" beside the +ve charge in the middle.)

Homework Equations



Charge density : \rho= \frac{dq}{dV}

Volume : V = 4\pi r^3

Electric field : E = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon} \int \frac{dq}{r^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



E at a distance r anywhere within [a, b] is constant.
E is caused by the point charge and distribution of charges in the volume.

E_{net} is constant, therefore

E_{charge}=-E_{volume}

\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon} \int \frac{dq_{charge}}{r_{charge}^2} = - \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon} \int \frac{dq_{volume}}{r_{volume}^2}

the E for a point charge doesn't need to have an integral, because it works out that way.

\frac{q_{charge}}{r^2} = - \int \frac{dq_{volume}}{r_{volume}^2}

Charge density : \rho= \frac{A}{r} = \frac{dq}{dV}

dq = \frac{A}{r} dV

\frac{q_{charge}}{r^2} = - \int \frac{A dV}{r^3}

dV is related to r because V = \frac{4}{3} \pi (r^3 - a^3)

then r^3 = \frac{3V + 4 \pi a^3}{4 \pi}

\frac{q_{charge}}{r^2} = - \int \frac{4 \pi A dV}{3V + 4 \pi a^3}

\frac{q_{charge}}{r^2} = - 4 \pi A \int \frac{dV}{3V + 4 \pi a^3}

\frac{q_{charge}}{r^2} = - \frac{4 \pi A}{3} ln (3V + 4 \pi a^3)

I don't know what to do after this, and I don't know what to do. I don't know if I messed up something.

This may be supposed to be done with Gauss' Law, but I couldn't figure out what to do with that.

Gauss' Law : \Phi = \oint E da (In this case since E and a are in the same direction, the dot product just became E da)
 

Attachments

  • physics.png
    physics.png
    10.2 KB · Views: 497
Physics news on Phys.org
\Phi = \oint E da = \int_a^b E 4 \pi r^2 dr = \frac{q}{\epsilon} I don't know what to do with this either. Can someone help me?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top