How Can a Heat Sink's Thermal Resistance Be Reduced with a Cooling Fan?

  • Thread starter Thread starter george varkey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Heat transfer
AI Thread Summary
To reduce a heat sink's thermal resistance when paired with a cooling fan, airflow is crucial, as it significantly impacts the heat dissipation efficiency. The existing heat sink has a thermal resistance of 1.1 K/W without airflow, which could potentially decrease to around 0.22 K/W with forced convection from the fan. Experimentation is recommended to determine the actual temperature rise under specific conditions, as theoretical calculations can be unreliable without proper context. Datasheets for heat sinks often provide thermal resistance values that vary with airflow, which can guide selection. Ultimately, achieving a significant reduction in thermal resistance is feasible with effective fan integration.
george varkey
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hello
I need help regarding a small project on thermoelectric refrigerator. I need to cool a 5.4 ltr capacity refrigerating space to maintain it at 10-12 degrees. I have the cooling module in place.I needed to dissipate 98 W of power from one module via a heat sink.

I have a heat sink that is of pin type measuring 96*96 mm with 98 pins of rectangular cross section.I need to find:

a) The thermal resistance of this heat sink when coupled with a cooling fan of 12.5W

b)how to choose a heat sink so that the temperature rise can be restricted to 20 degrees from the ambient temperature.

anyone having any idea in this topic please reply!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Temperature rise is a function of the airflow of the fan on the heatsink, so just multiply the heat you are dissipating by the specific heat of air and desired delta-T.

If you already have all your parts, I'd start finding some of the answers by experimentation: calculating the performance of a heatsink from scratch is near impossible.
 
george varkey said:
hello
I need help regarding a small project on thermoelectric refrigerator. I need to cool a 5.4 ltr capacity refrigerating space to maintain it at 10-12 degrees. I have the cooling module in place.I needed to dissipate 98 W of power from one module via a heat sink.

I have a heat sink that is of pin type measuring 96*96 mm with 98 pins of rectangular cross section.I need to find:

a) The thermal resistance of this heat sink when coupled with a cooling fan of 12.5W

b)how to choose a heat sink so that the temperature rise can be restricted to 20 degrees from the ambient temperature.

anyone having any idea in this topic please reply!

Generally the datasheet for the heat sink will give you numbers for its "thermal resistance" versus airflow and orientation. Can you find a datasheet for it? If not, you could try some Google Images searching to find similar heat sinks, and look for their datasheets.
 
thank you for both the replies!

1) yes i did figure out id have to experiment and find out the temperature rise of the heat sink( coupled with the fan )corresponding to the 90 W dissipation and see if it rises above the 20degrees from ambient.But isn't there any basic formulas behind it??(i did google it...not much help) Can you suggest me where it?

2) Yeah they do have a datasheet, but it has a thermal resistance (without the air flow) of 1.1 K/W which is a lot (because 1.1 *90 =99 degrees rise!...i do believe that is what it means right?) whereas by using the formula:

Th = Tamb + (Qh)*Rt
Th=50
Qh=90
Tamb=30

Rt comes out to be 0.22k/w ,ie to maintain temperature rise within the 20 degrees mark,i need something that is of this thermal resistance.

So i do want to know if the thermal resistance can fall this much,ie from 1.1 to .22 when coupled with a cooling fan.If so if there's any method to evaluate it theoritically?

(though my pin fin heat sink and fan should be sufficient... practically because it was provided by the thermoelectric suppliers corresponding to the particular module i had selected for cooling..so...)

yeah Ill be starting with the experimenting part !
 
george varkey said:
2) Yeah they do have a datasheet, but it has a thermal resistance (without the air flow) of 1.1 K/W which is a lot (because 1.1 *90 =99 degrees rise!...i do believe that is what it means right?) whereas by using the formula:

Th = Tamb + (Qh)*Rt
Th=50
Qh=90
Tamb=30

Rt comes out to be 0.22k/w ,ie to maintain temperature rise within the 20 degrees mark,i need something that is of this thermal resistance.

So i do want to know if the thermal resistance can fall this much,ie from 1.1 to .22 when coupled with a cooling fan.If so if there's any method to evaluate it theoritically?

Inproving the cooling by a factor of 5 by using forced convection doesn't seem unreasonable to me.

Almost all the formulas you will find on the web or in heat transfer handbooks are based on experimental correlations. The big problem with using them correctly is knowing what physical situation they apply to. Outside of their proper range they can sometimes be ridiculously wrong - even giving negative heat transfer (from cold to hot).

It may seem counter-intuitive, but it's actually easier to calculate heat transfer "from first principles" for much more extreme situations, like hypersonic flow (e.g. space shuttle re-entry) than for air wafting around at low speed where the flow pattern is strongly affected by the change in air temperature and the resulting changes in density and bouyancy.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top