How can geometric vectors be used to solve a river crossing problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter a.a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosine Vectors
AI Thread Summary
Geometric vectors can be applied to solve the river crossing problem by analyzing the boat's motion relative to the current. The boat, traveling at 20 km/h perpendicular to the river's flow, will drift downstream due to the river's current of 6 km/h. The resultant distance downstream from the marina is calculated to be 0.6 km, with the crossing taking 6 minutes. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the components of motion rather than solely focusing on resultant velocity. Ultimately, the problem illustrates how vector analysis can effectively determine the boat's trajectory and crossing time.
a.a
Messages
126
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. Homework Statement

A river is 2 km wide and flows at 6 km/h. A motor boat that has a speed of
20 km/h in still water heads out from one bank perpendicular to the current.
A marina lies directly across the river on the opposite bank. Use Geometric
Vectors to solve this problem.

a. How far downstream from the marina will the boat reach the other bank? (Answer: 0.6 km)
b. How long will it take? (Answer: 6 min)



Homework Equations



sine and cosine reltions

The Attempt at a Solution



I've found that the resultant velocity of the boat would be 20.88 km/h, but I am not sure how to find the distance (horizontal) that the boat travells.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a.a said:

Homework Statement



I've found that the resultant velocity of the boat would be 20.88 km/h, but I am not sure how to find the distance (horizontal) that the boat travells.

It's a triangle. Compute all the sides.

2 km, .6 km, 2.08 km

BTW, what makes you think the velocity of the perpendicular boat isn't 20km/h ?
 
Sorry, but how do you compute all three sides when you only have the perpendicular distance of 2km?
 
a.a said:
I've found that the resultant velocity of the boat would be 20.88 km/h, but I am not sure how to find the distance (horizontal) that the boat travells.

Hi a.a! :smile:

The question does not ask you for the resultant velocity, and you don't need to find it to answer the question.

Think again. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top