How can I calculate the expectation of L(y) using the commutation relation?

wam_mi
Messages
78
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I am trying to calculate the expectation of the y-component of the angular momentum L.
$<L_{y}>$. How should I approach this?


Homework Equations



I try to write it in terms of the following commutator

$L(y) = \frac{2*pi}{ih} [L_{x}, L_{z}]$


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you know about the state in which you are to take the expectation value?
 
Avodyne said:
What do you know about the state in which you are to take the expectation value?

Hi there, the state is given as |l, m>, where l is the orbital angular momentum quantum number, and m is the magnetic moment quantum number.

I want to prove that to compute <l,m| L(y) |l,m> = <L(y)> =0, how should I approach this?

Many thanks!
 
If I were you, I'd write L_y in terms of the raising and lowering operators L_{\pm}...
 
gabbagabbahey said:
If I were you, I'd write L_y in terms of the raising and lowering operators L_{\pm}...

Hi there, thank you for your reply.
I was told that I have to use the commutation relation between the L(x) and L^2 to get the expectation value of L(y). How can I do that though?

Thanks
 
wam_mi said:
Hi there, thank you for your reply.
I was told that I have to use the commutation relation between the L(x) and L^2 to get the expectation value of L(y). How can I do that though?

Thanks

I'm not sure...the only way I know of showing it is to use the raising and lowering operators.

You seem to be working on basically the exact same problem as jazznaz in this thread, so maybe you two should work together and see what you can come up with.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top