How can I calculate the square of the Pauli-Lubanski pseudovector?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the square of the Pauli-Lubanski pseudovector, specifically demonstrating that $$\textbf{W}^2 = -m^2\textbf{S}^2$$ in a rest frame. The Pauli-Lubanski vector is defined as $$W_{\mu} = \dfrac{1}{2}\varepsilon_{\mu\alpha\beta\gamma}M^{\alpha\beta}p^{\gamma}$$, with the operator $$M^{\mu\nu}=x^{\mu}p^{\nu} - x^{\nu}p^{\mu} + \frac{i}{2}\Sigma^{\mu\nu}$$. The discussion emphasizes the importance of calculating in the rest frame, where $$S^i = \varepsilon^{ijk}\frac{i}{2}\Sigma^{jk}$$ and $$\textbf{S}^2 = \dfrac{1}{2}\Sigma^{ij}\Sigma_{ij}$$ is established. The context of relativistic quantum field theory (QFT) and the representation theory of the Poincare group is also highlighted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with the Poincare group and its representation theory
  • Knowledge of the Pauli-Lubanski vector and its significance in relativistic physics
  • Basic concepts of angular momentum and spin in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Pauli-Lubanski vector in detail
  • Explore the representation theory of the Poincare group further
  • Examine the implications of Lorentz boosts on the Pauli-Lubanski vector
  • Review classical spin in relativity as discussed in the provided literature
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and relativistic quantum field theory, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of angular momentum and spin in relativistic contexts.

tannhaus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I need to calculate the square of the Pauli-Lubanski pseudovector in a rest frame such that the results is proportional to the square of the spin operator.
Hello there, recently I've been trying to demonstrate that, $$\textbf{W}^2 = -m^2\textbf{S}^2$$ in a rest frame, with ##W_{\mu}## defined as $$W_{\mu} = \dfrac{1}{2}\varepsilon_{\mu\alpha\beta\gamma}M^{\alpha\beta}p^{\gamma}$$ such that ##M^{\mu\nu}## is an operator of the form $$ M^{\mu\nu}=x^{\mu}p^{\nu} - x^{\nu}p^{\mu} + \frac{i}{2}\Sigma^{\mu\nu}$$ and ##S^i## defined as $$S_i = \varepsilon^{ijk}\frac{i}{2}\Sigma^{jk}$$ Where ##\Sigma^{\mu\nu} = [\beta^{\mu}, \beta^{\nu}]##. I've managed to show that ##\textbf{S}^2 = \dfrac{1}{2}\Sigma^{ij}\Sigma_{ij}## but I can't for my life work out the necessary result. Any sort of light towards this is very welcome!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your expressions are manifestly covariant. "Spin" for a massive particle is, however, most easily to interpret in the rest frame of the particle. So to have some intuitive picture, it's best to calculate it within this frame, and this is simply defined by ##(p^{\mu})=(m c,0,0,0)##. In this frame you have a pretty intuitive interpretation of "spin" and the Pauli Lubanski vector (the latter one being the only viable definition of spin in relativistic physics, where in general a unique split of total angular momentum into "spin" and "orbital" is not possible). For more on "classical spin" in relativity, see Sect. 1.8 in

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/pf-faq/srt.pdf

That becomes much clearer in the context of relativistic QFT and a detailed analysis of the representation theory of the Poincare group, where the Pauli Lubanski vector is the generator for little-group transformations, and the little group for massive-particle representations is the rotation group (or its covering group SU(2)) as defined in the rest frame of the particle. The quantities in other frames is then given by the (rotation free) Lorentz boosts from the rest frame of the particle to an arbitrary frame, where it's moving. For details see

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/lect.pdf

(particularly Appendix B).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K