How can I construct the 4D real representation of SU(2)?

Dilatino
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
An element of SU(2), such as for example the rotation around the x-axis generated by the first Pauli matrice can be written as

<br /> U(x) = e^{ixT_1} = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \cos\frac{x}{2} &amp; i\sin\frac{x}{2} \\<br /> i\sin\frac{x}{2} &amp; \cos\frac{x}{2} \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br /> =<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> c &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; -s \\<br /> 0 &amp; c &amp; s &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -s &amp; c &amp; 0 \\<br /> s &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; c \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br />

I assume that here c = \cos\frac{x}{2} and s = \sin\frac{x}{2}.The last 4 by 4 matrice is said to be constructed by treating the real and complex parts of each complex number as two real numbers. However, when doing this I would rather have expected that each complex number in the 2 by 2 matrice is expanded into its own 2 by 2 matrice, such that the resulting 4 by 4 matrice would schematically look like

<br /> U(x) =<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> Re(U_{11}) &amp; Im(U_{11}) &amp; Re(U_{12}) &amp; Im(U_{12}) \\<br /> Im(U_{11}) &amp; Re(U_{11}) &amp; Im(U_{12}) &amp; Re(U_{12}) \\<br /> Re(U_{21}) &amp; Im(U_{21}) &amp; Re(U_{22}) &amp; Im(U_{22}) \\<br /> Im(U_{21}) &amp; Re(U_{21}) &amp; Im(U_{11}) &amp; Re(U_{22}) \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br />

But this is obviously not how the 4 by 4 matrice is constructed. What am I missing or misunderstanding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you want to let ##U## act on
$$ U \begin{pmatrix} a+ib \\ c+ id \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} a'+ib' \\ c'+ id' \end{pmatrix}$$
and then rewrite this as a 4x4 matrix acting on ##(a~b~c~d)^T##. The reason that ##U_{4\times 4}## does not take the 2nd form you wrote is because of the factors of ##i## and ##i^2##.

Note that this doesn't actually give what we would call a representation of the group, because, if we do the same mapping on the generators (Pauli matrices), the image matrices don't satisfy the SU(2) algebra. If you really want the 4-dimensional representation, then a good way to work it out is by noting that it is the spin 3/2 representation. Then we know how the ##J_\pm, J_z## act on the states ##|3/2,m\rangle## and we can work out appropriate matrices for them.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top