How can I convert force (N) to RPM for my plant uprooting device?

  • Thread starter Thread starter agriculture
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convert Force Rpm
AI Thread Summary
To convert force (N) to RPM for a plant uprooting device, a direct relationship does not exist; it depends on the specific design of the device. The user is measuring a force of 10 N using a dynamometer and has a pulling device with two rollers. To determine the appropriate RPM, it is recommended to conduct tests by varying the RPM and measuring the resulting pull. This empirical approach will help establish the necessary RPM for effective plant uprooting. Testing is essential to find the optimal settings for the device.
agriculture
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have a question hope you can help me with. I am working on measuring plant uprooting force by using a denamometer. I want to convert this force (10 N) to RPM to apply this on my uprooting device. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question is not clear. What is RPM, roots per minute? Revolutions per minute? Were you using a dynamometer to measure force? What sort of plant uprooting device do you have?
 
Thanks SteamKing for your reply. The RPM here is Revolutions Per Minute. I will use dynamometer to measure the uprooting force for plants. The pulling device is two rollers, rotate in direction to pull upwards. if you know the relationship that's will be perfect. Thanks!
 
There's no relationship as such. It will depend on your device. You'll have to rig up some sort of test where you vary RPM and measure the pull.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top