How can I design a circuit with specific voltage and resistance specifications?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around designing a circuit with specific voltage and resistance requirements, specifically targeting a Vout between 4 and 5 volts without load and maintaining this within a 5% drop under load. The internal resistance of the battery varies from 35 Ohms to 200 Ohms as it wears down, complicating the design. The user has identified a region in the R1-R2 plane that meets the voltage requirement but struggles with the additional constraint of load resistance (RL) affecting the solution. They suspect that RL must exceed R1, which cannot be lower than 258 Ohms, but feel overwhelmed by the complexity of the problem. The user seeks assistance in simplifying their approach or validating their findings.
painfive
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi. I'm having trouble on this problem, and hopefully someone here can help me. It seems really simple, but every way I try to do it either leads to a dead end, or in one case, a very complicated answer that's probably wrong.

Here's the problem (the picture's attatched). RS is the internal resistance of the battery, and is 35 Ohms when it's new and gets up to 200 after it wears down. R1 and R2 must be chosen to fit the following specifications: 1) Vout must be between 4 and 5 volts when no load is attatched. 2) Vout cannot go down by more than 5% when a load RL is attatched. The answers may or may not involve RL.

After trying a few things that went nowhere, I finally found a way that seemed to work. I was able to find the region in the R1-R2 plane where the Vout will be between 4 and 5 (a wedge with the corner at about (258,367) and slopes 4/5 and 5/4). So any (R1,R2) in this region that satisfies the 5% requirement would be an answer. The problem is that the region which satisfied the 5% inequality was underneath a hyperbola, and it didn't always intersect the other region, depending on RL (after doing a lot of work, I'm pretty sure RL must be greater than R1, which can't be less than 258). Not only did the problem not give any restrictions on RL, but it was much more work than I thought it would be. Both of these lead me to believe I'm wrong and/or doing it a much harder way than necessary. Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, painfive!

I'm afraid your picture didn't make it into your last post -- would you like to try posting the picture again?

- Warren
 
ok, its fixed now
 
Last edited:
Does anyone have any ideas? I can post some more of my work if you want, but it's probably wrong anyway.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top