How can I draw angles using just a ruler and compass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dooga Blackrazor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Drawing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on techniques for drawing angles using only a ruler and compass, specifically mentioning angles like 60, 35, and 45 degrees. It highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between angles and their corresponding slopes on a coordinate plane, utilizing trigonometric functions to determine side lengths. The method of angle bisection is emphasized as a straightforward way to create a 45-degree angle. Participants suggest drawing circles to establish points of intersection, which aids in constructing the desired angles. Overall, the conversation provides practical insights into geometric constructions with basic tools.
Dooga Blackrazor
Messages
258
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know a site that shows how to draw angles using only a ruler and a compass?

60 degree, 35 degree, 45 degree angels ect.

Any explanation on how to do this would be great. I have to show curves to signify that I used the compass and I believe the method involves a point of intersection.

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine a x/y coordinate plane with a line segment going out \theta counterclockwise from the positive x-axis. You can use the fact that the tangent of that angle will give you the slope of that line to figure out the x and y distance you have to go to make that angle.

If that's not clear, just draw a triangle and label your theta. Using trig functions you can find the possibilities for the sides.
 
Drawing a 45 degree angle is easy if you know how to bisect an angle (you use two coordinate axes).
 
Define A value for one of your sides use trig to find the value for the other two sides given an angle.

From this set your compas to your first desired length draw a circle
then set the compas to the second length pick a point along the first circle draw your next circle
 
I finished my bonus sheet, I appreciate everyone's help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top