How can I handle the singularity in my integrand equation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Teg Veece
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Singularity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on handling singularities in integrand equations, specifically the function g(x, x') defined as g(𝑥,𝑥′) = ∫_{−∞}^{∞} exp(−(𝑢−𝑥′)²)/|𝑥−𝑢| d𝑢. The singularity occurs when u equals x, causing the integrand to approach infinity. Suggestions include using a distance metric with a constant added to the denominator, such as |x-u| + c, where c is a positive number. Additionally, the use of spherical coordinates is discussed as a potential method to simplify the evaluation of the integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integrals and singularities in mathematical functions
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates in three-dimensional space
  • Basic knowledge of error functions and their applications
  • Concepts of distance metrics in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of complex analysis in resolving singularities in integrals
  • Explore the use of distance metrics in mathematical modeling
  • Study the properties and applications of error functions in integrals
  • Learn about the transformation of integrals using spherical coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers dealing with integrals involving singularities, as well as students studying advanced calculus and mathematical analysis.

Teg Veece
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have an equation that relates two variables:
k(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}') =exp(-(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}')^2)
If I want to determine the value of this equation where x' is kept constant and x is actually the set of every real number then I can express the function as the integral where the integrand relates x' to the integration variable u between the interval of minus infinity to infinity:
f(\mathbf{x}') = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} exp(-(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{x}')^2) d\mathbf{u}
and the solution to this will be some sort of error function.

Now, a slight variation on this. I need to include an additional term that's like a weighting term which decays with distance from x. So I'm trying to find a solution for the following equation:
g(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}') = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{exp(-(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{x}')^2)}{|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{u}|} d\mathbf{u}
The problem I'm having is that when \mathbf{u} = \mathbf{x},
then the integrand goes to infinity. I think I can get around it by possibly converting to spherical coordinates (all of vectors here are 3-D vectors) but I also need to evaluate the function, h, when x' is also integrated from minus infinity to infinity and a second weighting term is introduced:
h(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}') = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{exp(-(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v})^2)}{|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{u}||\mathbf{x}'-\mathbf{v}|} d\mathbf{u}d\mathbf{v},
and here the spherical coordinate approach doesn't seem to help.

How do I deal with this singularity? Someone suggested complex analysis but I'm not very familiar with that area.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I can post how I evaluate g(.,.) using spherical coordinates if people think it'd help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Teg Veece and welcome to the forums.

One suggestion is to use a distance metric plus a constant. So instead of |x-u| you scale it by say |x-u|+c where c is a preferably positive number (unless you want the behaviour of a negative). Something like c = 1 seems like a good initial one to try.
 
Thanks for the quick reply.

Wouldn't adding a constant to the denominator not have a significant effect on the final result depending on what I set c to be? Like c = 0.01 would be a very different solution from c=10.

I know that they have a similar problem with singularities when calculating gravitational potential but they get around that by using spherical coordinates:

\Phi(\mathbf{x}) = -G \int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{x}')}{|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}'|}d \mathbf{x}'

I think you can do a change of variables and, when you convert to spherical polar, the r^2 that appears above the line cancels with the denominator to leave you with just a r term multiplying the numerator.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K